Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct:251:105875.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105875. Epub 2024 Jul 16.

Hijacking limitations of working memory load to test for composition in language

Michael T Ullman  1 , Talat Bulut  2 , Matthew Walenski  3
Affiliations

Hijacking limitations of working memory load to test for composition in language

Michael T Ullman et al. Cognition. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Although language depends on storage and composition, just what is stored or (de)composed remains unclear. We leveraged working memory load limitations to test for composition, hypothesizing that decomposed forms should particularly tax working memory. We focused on a well-studied paradigm, English inflectional morphology. We predicted that (compositional) regulars should be harder to maintain in working memory than (non-compositional) irregulars, using a 3-back production task. Frequency, phonology, orthography, and other potentially confounding factors were controlled for. Compared to irregulars, regulars and their accompanying -s/-ing-affixed filler items yielded more errors. Underscoring the decomposition of only regulars, regulars yielded more bare-stem (e.g., walk) and stem affixation errors (walks/walking) than irregulars, whereas irregulars yielded more past-tense-form affixation errors (broughts/tolded). In line with previous evidence that regulars can be stored under certain conditions, the regular-irregular difference held specifically for phonologically consistent (not inconsistent) regulars, in particular for both low and high frequency consistent regulars in males, but only for low frequency consistent regulars in females. Sensitivity analyses suggested the findings were robust. The study further elucidates the computation of inflected forms, and introduces a simple diagnostic for linguistic composition.

Keywords: Composition; Irregular; Language; Morphology; Regular; Working memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Adams EJ, Nguyen AT, & Cowan N (2018). Theories of Working Memory: Differences in Definition, Degree of Modularity, Role of Attention, and Purpose. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(3), 340–355. 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-17-0114 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alegre M, & Gordon P (1999). Frequency Effects and the Representational Status of Regular Inflections. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(1). 10.1006/jmla.1998.2607 - DOI
    1. Amon MJ, & Bertenthal BI (2018). Auditory Versus Visual Stimulus Effects on Cognitive Performance During the N-back Task. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2018.
    1. Atkinson RC, & Shiffrin RM (1968). Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60422-3 - DOI
    1. Baayen RH, & Milin P (2010). Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(2), 12–28. 10.21500/20112084.807 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources