Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep;38(9):1949-1957.
doi: 10.1038/s41375-024-02335-2. Epub 2024 Jul 17.

Molecular relapse after first-line intensive therapy in patients with CBF or NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia - a FILO study

Affiliations

Molecular relapse after first-line intensive therapy in patients with CBF or NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia - a FILO study

Corentin Orvain et al. Leukemia. 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Patients with Core-Binding Factor (CBF) and NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) can be monitored by quantitative PCR after having achieved first complete remission (CR) to detect morphologic relapse and drive preemptive therapy. How to best manage these patients is unknown. We retrospectively analyzed 303 patients with CBF and NPM1-mutated AML, aged 18-60 years, without allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in first CR, with molecular monitoring after first-line intensive therapy. Among these patients, 153 (51%) never relapsed, 95 (31%) had molecular relapse (53 received preemptive therapy and 42 progressed to morphologic relapse at salvage therapy), and 55 (18%) had upfront morphologic relapse. Patients who received preemptive therapy had higher OS than those who received salvage therapy after having progressed from molecular to morphologic relapse and those with upfront morphologic relapse (three-year OS: 78% vs. 51% vs. 51%, respectively, P = 0.01). Preemptive therapy included upfront allogeneic HCT (n = 19), intensive chemotherapy (n = 21), and non-intensive therapy (n = 13; three-year OS: 92% vs. 79% vs. 58%, respectively, P = 0.09). Although not definitive due to the non-randomized allocation of patients to different treatment strategies at relapse, our study suggests that molecular monitoring should be considered during follow-up to start preemptive therapy before overt morphologic relapse.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Employment or Leadership Position: none; Consultant or Advisory Role: Pierre Peterlin, Abbvie, BMS and Servier; Christian Récher, Abbvie, Amgen, Astellas, BMS, Boehringer, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Servier; Stock Ownership: none; Honoraria: none; Research Funding: Pierre Peterlin, Astellas and Jazz Pharmaceuticals; Christian Récher, Abbvie, Amgen, Astellas, BMS, Iqvia, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals; Expert Testimony: none; Patents: none; Other Remuneration: none.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Description of states and transitions in the multistate model.
A Flow chart of patients with CBF and NPM1-mutated AML included in the study cohort with description of states and transitions used in the multistate model. B Predicted probabilities of being in a specific state over time, from initial diagnosis.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cumulative incidence of molecular and morphologic relapses in the study cohort (n = 303).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Overall survival of 150 patients with CBF or NPM1-mutated AML who relapsed during follow-up, stratified by the type of relapse (molecular relapse with preemptive therapy vs. molecular relapse with morphologic relapse at the time of salvage therapy vs. upfront morphologic relapse), calculated from the time of first detected relapse.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Overall survival of 53 patients with CBF or NPM1-mutated AML with molecular relapse who received preemptive therapy, stratified by the type of salvage therapy (upfront allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) vs. intensive chemotherapy vs. non-intensive chemotherapy), calculated from the time of first detected relapse.

References

    1. Döhner H, Wei AH, Appelbaum FR, Craddock C, DiNardo CD, Dombret H, et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2022 recommendations from an international expert panel on behalf of the ELN. Blood. 2022;140:1345–77. 10.1182/blood.2022016867 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jourdan E, Boissel N, Chevret S, Delabesse E, Renneville A, Cornillet P, et al. Prospective evaluation of gene mutations and minimal residual disease in patients with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2013;121:2213–23. 10.1182/blood-2012-10-462879 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Balsat M, Renneville A, Thomas X, de Botton S, Caillot D, Marceau A, et al. Postinduction minimal residual disease predicts outcome and benefit from allogeneic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia With NPM1 mutation: a study by the acute leukemia french association group. JCO. 2017;35:185–93.10.1200/JCO.2016.67.1875 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chevallier P, Prebet T, Pigneux A, Hunault M, Delaunay J, Perry F, et al. Influence of NPM1 and FLT3-ITD status on outcome in relapsed/refractory AML patients receiving salvage therapy including gemtuzumab ozogamicin. Leukemia. 2010;24:467–9. 10.1038/leu.2009.214 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burnett AK, Goldstone A, Hills RK, Milligan D, Prentice A, Yin J, et al. Curability of patients with acute myeloid leukemia who did not undergo transplantation in first remission. JCO. 2013;31:1293–301.10.1200/JCO.2011.40.5977 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources