Fracture liaison service-a multidisciplinary approach to osteoporosis management
- PMID: 39020092
- PMCID: PMC11427598
- DOI: 10.1007/s00198-024-07181-7
Fracture liaison service-a multidisciplinary approach to osteoporosis management
Abstract
A fracture liaison service is a systems-level multidisciplinary approach designed to reduce subsequent fracture risk in patients who recently sustained fragility fractures. It is estimated that one in three women and one in five men over the age of 50 years old have osteoporosis. Nonetheless, only 9 to 20% of patients who sustain an initial fragility fracture eventually receive any osteoporosis treatment. With the aim of preventing subsequent fractures, a fracture liaison service (FLS) works through identifying patients presenting with fragility fractures to the hospital and providing them with easier access to osteoporosis care through referrals for bone health and fracture risk assessment and recommendation or initiation of osteoporosis treatment. Currently, there are four major types of FLS models ranging from services that only identify at-risk patients and inform and educate the patient but take no further part in communicating their findings to other stakeholders in patients' care, to services that identify, investigate, and initiate treatment at the other end of the spectrum. In this article, we review the benefits, challenges, and outcomes of FLS in the American healthcare system with further exploration of the roles each member of the multidisciplinary team can play in improving patients' bone health.
Keywords: Fracture liaison service; Fracture prevention; Fragility fracture; Osteoporosis; Osteoporotic fracture.
© 2024. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Figures
References
-
- Kanis JA (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group. Osteoporos Int 4(6):368–381. 10.1007/BF01622200 - PubMed
-
- Melton LJ 3rd, Atkinson EJ, O’Connor MK, O’Fallon WM, Riggs BL (1998) Bone density and fracture risk in men. J Bone Miner Res 13(12):1915–1923. 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.12.1915 - PubMed
-
- Singer A, Exuzides A, Spangler L et al (2015) Burden of illness for osteoporotic fractures compared with other serious diseases among postmenopausal women in the United States. Mayo Clin Proc 90(1):53–62. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.09.011 - PubMed
-
- Boudou L, Gerbay B, Chopin F, Ollagnier E, Collet P, Thomas T (2011) Management of osteoporosis in fracture liaison service associated with long-term adherence to treatment. Osteoporos Int 22(7):2099–2106. 10.1007/s00198-011-1638-6 - PubMed
-
- Adachi JD, Brown JP, Schemitsch E, Tarride JE, Brown V, Bell AD, Reiner M, Packalen M, Motsepe-Ditshego P, Burke N, Slatkovska L (2021) Fragility fracture identifies patients at imminent risk for subsequent fracture: real-world retrospective database study in Ontario, Canada. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22(1):224. 10.1186/s12891-021-04051-9 - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical