Analysis of Immunological Biomarkers Associated With Rejection After Uterus Transplantation in Human
- PMID: 39020469
- DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005126
Analysis of Immunological Biomarkers Associated With Rejection After Uterus Transplantation in Human
Abstract
Background: Uterus transplantation (UTx) is an emerging therapy for women with uterine infertility. However, critical questions remain with this procedure including the mechanisms involved in graft rejection.
Methods: In this study, we analyzed the immune profile of ectocervical biopsies from 5 patients after UTx before and during their first episode of rejection using RNA sequencing, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and imaging mass cytometry.
Results: We identified 530 upregulated and 207 downregulated genes associated with graft rejection. Enrichment databases revealed abnormalities of skin-associated genes and the immune system, in particular activation of T and B lymphocytes, and macrophages. Imaging mass cytometry confirmed these observations; in cervical biopsies of 3 women, rejection was associated with the presence of B-cell structures linked to tertiary lymphoid structures, and 2 biopsies from 1 woman with severe rejection episodes and poor prognosis of graft function (repeated miscarriage and implantation failures) were associated with an accumulation of HLA-DR - macrophages, producing granzyme B at the surface of the epithelium.
Conclusions: We showed that rejection of a UTx graft was associated with major alterations of immune markers including the involvement of tertiary lymphoid structures, the most organized of which may be a sign of chronic rejection, and with an increase in HLA-DR - macrophages expressing granzyme B in the case of grade 3 rejection episodes according Mölne's classification. We identified potential emerging biomarkers to predict or diagnose graft rejection (Keratin 1 granzyme B, IL1β). These findings could lead to development of improved strategies for the identification, prevention, and/or treatment of uterus graft rejection.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01844362.
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Sieunarine K, Zakaria FB, Boyle DC, et al. Possibilities for fertility restoration: a new surgical technique. Int Surg. 2005;90:249–256.
-
- Brannstrom M, Johannesson L, Bokstrom H, et al. Livebirth after uterus transplantation. Lancet. 2015;385:607–616.
-
- Ayoubi JM, Carbonnel M, Racowsky C, et al. Evolving clinical challenges in uterus transplantation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022;45:947–960.
-
- Brannstrom M, Racowsky C, Carbonnel M, et al. Uterus transplantation: from research, through human trials and into the future. Hum Reprod Update. 2023;29:521–544.
-
- D’Amico G, Del Prete L, Eghtesad B, et al. Immunosuppression in uterus transplantation: from transplant to delivery. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2023;24:29–35.
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Medical