Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 15;75(21):6823-6836.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erae289.

Reducing stomatal density by expression of a synthetic epidermal patterning factor increases leaf intrinsic water use efficiency and reduces plant water use in a C4 crop

Affiliations

Reducing stomatal density by expression of a synthetic epidermal patterning factor increases leaf intrinsic water use efficiency and reduces plant water use in a C4 crop

John N Ferguson et al. J Exp Bot. .

Abstract

Enhancing crop water use efficiency (WUE) is a key target trait for climatic resilience and expanding cultivation on marginal lands. Engineering lower stomatal density to reduce stomatal conductance (gs) has improved WUE in multiple C3 crop species. However, reducing gs in C3 species often reduces photosynthetic carbon gain. A different response is expected in C4 plants because they possess specialized anatomy and biochemistry which concentrates CO2 at the site of fixation. This modifies the relationship of photosynthesis (AN) with intracellular CO2 concentration (ci), such that photosynthesis is CO2 saturated and reductions in gs are unlikely to limit AN. To test this hypothesis, genetic strategies were investigated to reduce stomatal density in the C4 crop sorghum. Constitutive expression of a synthetic epidermal patterning factor (EPF) transgenic allele in sorghum led to reduced stomatal densities, reduced gs, reduced plant water use, and avoidance of stress during a period of water deprivation. In addition, moderate reduction in stomatal density did not increase stomatal limitation to AN. However, these positive outcomes were associated with negative pleiotropic effects on reproductive development and photosynthetic capacity. Avoiding pleiotropy by targeting expression of the transgene to specific tissues could provide a pathway to improved agronomic outcomes.

Keywords: Sorghum bicolor; C4 photosynthesis; stomata; water-use efficiency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Phenotypic screen of transgenic plants. Abaxial stomatal density of independent transgenic events of sorghum (A) ubiquitously expressing the sorghum orthologue of EPIDERMAL PATTERNING FACTOR-1 (SbEPF1) and (B) ubiquitously expressing a fusion element synthesized from elements of the sorghum orthologues of EPIDERMAL PATTERNING FACTOR-2 (EPF2) and EPIDERMAL PATTERNING FACTOR-LIKE 9 (EPFL9) (SbEPFsyn). The events that displayed significantly different stomatal densities compared with the wild type (WT), according to a post-hoc Tukey test following a one-way ANOVA, are denoted by red asterisks. The independent events of SbEPFsyn that were carried forward for further investigation are highlighted in bold and underlined (ZG602-5-12b and ZG600-6-13a).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Stomatal patterning phenotype of engineered plants. Representative micrographs of the abaxial leaf surface of: (A) the wild type (WT), (B) SbEPFsyn line ZG602-5-12b (12b), and (C) SbEPFsyn line ZG600-6-13a (13a), along with the associated (D) abaxial stomatal density and (E) adaxial stomatal density at three leaf positions on the main culm (three, four, and five) for each genotype. Bars represent least square means of stomatal density for each grouping, where the errors bar represent the associated SEs. For the abaxial and the adaxial surface, the P-values from each term in a two-way ANOVA with an interaction term are inset.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Leaf gas exchange of engineered plants. Light-saturated (A) stomatal conductance (gs), (B) net photosynthetic assimilation of CO2 (AN), and (C) intrinsic water-use efficiency (iWUE) of the sixth leaf on the culm when it was the youngest fully expanded leaf of the wild type (WT), SbEPFsyn line ZG602-5-12b (12b), and SbEPFsyn line ZG600-6-13a (13a). Bars represent least square means, and error bars represent associated SEs. Significant differences between genotypes are denoted as *P>0.05, ** P>0.01, or *** P>0.001.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Photosynthetic capacity of engineered plants. Fitted average photosynthetic/CO2 response (A/ci) curves of (A) the wild type (WT), (B) SbEPFsyn line ZG602-5-12b (12b), and (C) SbEPFsyn line ZG600-6-13a (13a), along with (D) the apparent maximum rate of carboxylation by PEPC (Vpmax), (A) the asymptote of the A/ci curve (Vmax), (F) specific leaf area (SLA), and (G) leaf nitrogen (N) content of the sixth leaf on the culm when it was the youngest fully expanded leaf. For A/ci curves, the mean fit is represented by the solid line and the SE is denoted by the shaded area. The stomatal limitation to AN at ambient [CO2] (SL) is reported for each treatment. The operating point of photosynthesis at ambient [CO2] is shown as a blue dot on the A/ci curve. Bars represent least square means, and error bars represent associated SEs. The P-values from associated one-way ANOVA tests are inset. Where a significant effect was detected, the differences between the transgenic lines and the WT according to post-hoc testing is shown.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Water use and leaf gas exchange of engineered plants during a dry-down period. The response of (A) percentage relative soil water content, (B) stomatal conductance (gs), and (C) net photosynthetic assimilation of CO2 (AN) to a 9 d water withdrawal period for wild-type (WT), SbEPFsyn line ZG602-5-12b (12b), and SbEPFsyn line ZG600-6-13a (13a) sorghum. Points and errors bars represent least square means and SEs, respectively. P-values associated with repeated measure ANOVAs are inset. Days where transgenic events ZG602-5-12b (12b) and ZG600-6-13a (13a) were significantly different from the WT for all traits are indicated by red asterisks. The statistical results of pairwise tests between each transgenic line and the WT for a specific contrast of average gs and AN on the first 5 d of the experiment is shown by the inset bracket.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Whole-plant phenotypic characters of engineered plants. (A) Photographs of representative plants of wild-type (WT), SbEPFsyn line ZG602-5-12b (12b), and SbEPFsyn line ZG600-6-13a (13a) plants on day 8 of the water withdrawal period. (B) Total dried above-ground biomass of all genotypes grown under water-replete conditions or subjected to the water withdrawal period. Bars represent least square means, and error bars represent associated SEs. P-values associated with each term from an associated two-way ANOVA are inset.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.
Photographs of representative panicles from wild-type sorghum (WT) and sorghum ubiquitously expressing a fusion element synthesized from elements of the sorghum orthologues of EPIDERMAL PATTERNING FACTOR-2 (EPF2) and EPIDERMAL PATTERNING FACTOR-LIKE 9 (EPFL9) (SbEPFsyn).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abràmoff MD, Magalhães PJ, Ram SJ.. 2006. Image processing with ImageJ. In: Cox G, ed. Optical imaging techniques in cell biology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 249–258.
    1. Bailey-Serres J, Parker JE, Ainsworth EA, Oldroyd GED, Schroeder JI.. 2019. Genetic strategies for improving crop yields. Nature 575, 109–118. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blum A. 2005. Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential—are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 1159–1168.
    1. Boyer JS. 1982. Plant productivity and environment. Science 218, 443–448. - PubMed
    1. Briggs L, Shantz H.. 1917. The water requirement of plants as influenced by environment. In: Proceedings of the Second Pan-American Science Congress. Washington DC, 95–107.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources