Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 1;4(2):34-39.
doi: 10.2500/jfa.2022.4.220009. eCollection 2022 Jul.

A review of the safety of oral immunotherapy in clinical trial and real-world studies

Affiliations

A review of the safety of oral immunotherapy in clinical trial and real-world studies

Stephanie Leeds et al. J Food Allergy. .

Abstract

Safety concerns are a barrier to oral immunotherapy (OIT). This review aims to describe OIT safety events and explore potential risk factors and mitigating factors. Published clinical and real-world OIT studies were reviewed for data on safety outcomes in OIT. Gastrointestinal symptoms are one of the most common adverse reactions associated with OIT, and persistent symptoms can be associated with an eosinophilic response. Allergic reactions are increased in OIT compared with avoidance; however, these symptoms tend not to be severe and to decrease over time. Despite OIT, epinephrine usage persists in studies and life-threatening reactions (though rare) have occurred. High baseline food specific immunoglobulin E levels, aggressive dosing, uncontrolled atopic comorbidities, and poor adherence to protocols may contribute to the severity of adverse events. OIT remains a shared decision that incorporates best medical evidence and appropriate patient selection. It requires individualized care and action plans to ensure safe outcomes.

Keywords: food allergy; oral immunotherapy; safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

S. Leeds receives consultancy fees from Regeneron; J. Wang received institutional research funding from Regeneron, DBV, Aimmune; consultancy fees from DBV, ALK Abello, Genentech; and is an UpToDate author. J. Kuster has no conflicts of interest to disclose pertaining to this article

References

    1. Greenhawt MJ, Vickery BP. Allergist-reported trends in the practice of food allergen oral immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015; 3:33–38. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nurmatov U, Dhami S, Arasi Set al. . Allergen immunotherapy for IgE-mediated food allergy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Allergy. 2017; 72:1133–1147. - PubMed
    1. Wasserman RL, Hague AR, Pence DMet al. . Real-world experience with peanut oral immunotherapy: lessons learned from 270 patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019; 7:418–426.e4. - PubMed
    1. Goldberg MR, Nachshon L, Levy MBet al. . Risk factors and treatment outcomes for oral immunotherapy-induced gastrointestinal symptoms and eosinophilic responses (OITIGER). J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020; 8:125–131. - PubMed
    1. Wright BL, Fernandez-Becker NQ, Kambham Net al. . Baseline gastrointestinal eosinophilia is common in oral immunotherapy subjects with IgE-mediated peanut allergy. Front Immunol. 2018; 9:2624. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources