Do multisource data matter for NGP prediction? Evidence from the G-LSTM model
- PMID: 39022004
- PMCID: PMC11253679
- DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33387
Do multisource data matter for NGP prediction? Evidence from the G-LSTM model
Abstract
Precisely predicting natural gas prices (NGPs) is important because it can provide the necessary decision-making basis for energy scheduling, planning and control. However, NGPs are affected by many factors and exhibit the characteristics of nonlinearity and randomness, which makes accurate predictions challenging. Therefore, in this paper, the information gain of multisource data and the global optimization ability of the gray wolf algorithm are used to build a multifactor-driven NGP hybrid forecasting model to improve the prediction performance. First, the emotional tendency and readability of news text are extracted and calculated by using VADER and textstat tools, respectively. Then the network search index is filtered and integrated by using the correlation coefficient method and the CRITIC method to form alternative variables of multisource data (news and search index). Second, the gray wolf optimization algorithm is used to find and determine the best key parameter group in long short-term memory model. Finally, the spot price of natural gas in Henry Hub from March 1, 2012 to February 28, 2022 is selected as the prediction object, and multi-scenario numerical experiments are carried out to verify the effectiveness of the proposed model. The ablation experiment results show that the information gain brought by multisource data can effectively improve the prediction effect of NGPs. Furthermore, the proposed model has the best prediction performance in different scenarios and can be regarded as a promising prediction tool.
Keywords: Multisource data; Natural gas price forecast; News text; Search index.
© 2024 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures












References
-
- Caporin M., Fontini F., Panzica R. The systemic risk of US oil and natural gas companies. Energy Econ. 2023;121 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106650. - DOI
-
- Greaker M., Lund Sagen E. Explaining experience curves for new energy technologies: a case study of liquefied natural gas. Energy Econ. 2008;30:2899–2911. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2008.03.011. - DOI
-
- Alam M.S., Murshed M., Manigandan P., Pachiyappan D., Abduvaxitovna S.Z. Forecasting oil, coal, and natural gas prices in the pre-and post-COVID scenarios: contextual evidence from India using time series forecasting tools. Resour. Pol. 2023;81 doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103342. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kröger M., Longmuir M., Neuhoff K., Schütze F. The price of natural gas dependency: price shocks, inequality, and public policy. Energy Pol. 2023;175 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113472. - DOI
-
- Su C.W., Qin M., Chang H.-L., Țăran A.-M. Which risks drive European natural gas bubbles? Novel evidence from geopolitics and climate. Resour. Pol. 2023;81 doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103381. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources