Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 1;2(1):75-80.
doi: 10.2500/jfa.2020.2.200005. eCollection 2020 Sep.

Food allergy oral immunotherapy

Affiliations

Food allergy oral immunotherapy

Amika K Sood et al. J Food Allergy. .

Abstract

Food allergy oral immunotherapy (OIT) has demonstrated efficacy in promoting clinically relevant immunomodulation that leads to desensitization (reduced reactivity while on OIT) in the majority of treated individuals; however, sustained unresponsiveness after OIT cessation for a specified interval has only been observed in a subset. The potential therapeutic benefits of OIT must be balanced with the risk for adverse events. These adverse events may range from self-limited or easily treated oropharyngeal, respiratory, or gastrointestinal symptoms to persistent abdominal symptoms that lead to cessation of therapy and to anaphylaxis. To date, the majority of studies have evaluated single-allergen OIT approaches; however, multi-allergen OIT has demonstrated favorable safety and efficacy outcomes, and is the subject of ongoing investigation. Recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of the first licensed OIT product for peanut allergy challenges the long-standing paradigm of dietary food avoidance as the sole option for individuals with food allergy. Yet, the limitations of this "first-generation" treatment support the need for continued research and development of next-generation therapies to improve efficacy, minimize risk, and allow for broad applicability to both individuals with single-food allergy and those with multifood allergies. Optimizing future therapies will require developing novel approaches that maximize both efficacy and safety and/or tolerability outcomes, potentially through the combination with biologic therapies or adjuvants. Shared decision-making among patients, physicians, and parents and/or caregivers is critical to select optimal candidates for treatment with OIT by balancing the potential therapeutic benefit and possible risk reduction with a realistic consideration of OIT treatment burden and the risk of treatment-related adverse events.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare pertaining to this article

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Overview of food allergen oral immunotherapy (OIT), including phases of treatment and clinical outcome definitions.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Flow chart representation of three phase-dosing schema for Palforzia oral immunotherapy (OIT) treatment of peanut allergy adapted from the package insert. See package insert for full prescribing details.

References

    1. Sood AK, Scurlock AM.. Food allergy oral immunotherapy. J Food Allergy. 2020; 2:75–80. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chow T, Parrish C, Bird JA.. Food allergy epicutaneous immunotherapy. J Food Allergy. 2020; 2:81–84. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vickery BP, Scurlock AM, Kulis Met al. . Sustained unresponsiveness to peanut in subjects who have completed peanut oral immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014; 133:468–475. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anagnostou K, Islam S, King Yet al. . Assessing the efficacy of oral immunotherapy for the desensitisation of peanut allergy in children (STOP II): a phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2014; 383:1297–1304. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burks AW, Jones SM, Wood RAet al. . Oral immunotherapy for treatment of egg allergy in children. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367:233–243. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources