Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov;52(4):1916-1946.
doi: 10.1177/00491241211031270. Epub 2021 Jul 30.

Applying Responsive Survey Design to Small-Scale Surveys: Campus Surveys of Sexual Misconduct

William G Axinn  1 , James Wagner  1 , Mick Couper  1 , Scott Crawford  2
Affiliations

Applying Responsive Survey Design to Small-Scale Surveys: Campus Surveys of Sexual Misconduct

William G Axinn et al. Sociol Methods Res. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Responsive survey design is a technique aimed at improving the efficiency or quality of surveys by using incoming data from the field to make design changes. The technique was pioneered on large national surveys, but the tools can also be applied on the smaller-scale surveys most commonly used by sociologists. We demonstrate responsive survey design in a small-scale, list-based sample survey of students on the topic of sexual misconduct. We investigate the impact of individual incentive levels and a two-phase responsive design with changes to mode of contact as approaches for limiting the potential of nonresponse bias in data from such surveys. Our analyses demonstrate that a two-phase design introducing telephone and face-to-face reminders to complete the survey can produce stronger change in response rates and characteristics of those who respond than higher incentive levels. These findings offer tools for sociologists designing smaller-scale surveys of special populations or sensitive topics.

Keywords: Responsive survey design; climate surveys; sexual misconduct; survey methods; survey nonresponse.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. The American Association for Public Opinion Research. 2016. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. 9th Edition. AAPOR. Retrieved March 23, 2021 (https://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/publications/Standard-Definitions...).
    1. Axinn William G., Link Cynthia F., and Groves Robert M.. 2011. “Responsive Survey Design, Demographic Data Collection, and Models of Demographic Behavior.” Demography 48(3):1127–1149. doi:10.1007/s13524-011-0044-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bandilla Wolfgang, Couper Mick P., and Kaczmirek Lars. 2014. “The Effectiveness of Mailed Invitations for Web Surveys and the Representativeness of Mixed-mode versus Internet-only Samples.” Survey Practice 7(4).
    1. Biemer Paul P., Murphy Joe, Zimmer Stephanie, Berry Chip, Deng Grace, and Lewis Katie. 2018. “Using Bonus Monetary Incentives to Encourage Web Response in Mixed-Mode Household Surveys.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 6(2):240–261. doi:10.1093/jssam/smx015. - DOI
    1. Cantor David, Fisher Bonnie, Chibnall Susan, Townsend Reanne, Lee Hyunshik, Bruce Carol, and Thomas Gail. 2015. Report on the AAU Campus Climate Survey on Sexual Assault and Sexual Misconduct. Rockville, MD: Westat. Retrieved March 23, 2021 (https://www.aau.edu/sites/default/files/%40%20Files/Climate%20Survey/AAU...).

LinkOut - more resources