Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 1;40(9):557-560.
doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001232.

Response to "Competing Narratives: Moving the Field Forward on Spinal Cord Stimulation"

Affiliations

Response to "Competing Narratives: Moving the Field Forward on Spinal Cord Stimulation"

Sam Eldabe et al. Clin J Pain. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

S.E. reports consultancy fees from Medtronic, and Mainstay Medical outside the submitted work. He has received department research funding from the National Institute of Health Research, Saluda Medical and Medtronic. S.N. reports consultancy fees from Saluda Medical. A.B.: MTech Access was commissioned by Saluda Medical to participate in this project. N.A.M. reports receiving grants from Neuros, Mesoblast, and Vivex Biologics, as well as consulting as a medical monitor for Saluda Medical, Nevro, Vivex Biologics, Mainstay, Sollis Therapeutics, and Vertos outside the submitted work. C.G. reports consulting fees and stock options received from Mainstay, personal fees from Mainstay, Saluda Medical, Persica, and Iliad outside the submitted work, research funded by Sollis, expert witness testimony fees, and serves as Editor-in-Chief of Pain Practice. B.B. reports an educational grant from Saluda Medical and consultancy fees from Salvia Bioelectronics, Medtronic and Abbott outside the submitted work. P.S.S. has received consultancy fees from Medtronic, Saluda Medical, Nalu, and Biotronic outside the submitted work, and has stock options from Saluda Medical and Nalu. N.S., A.L., and R.V.D. are employees of Saluda Medical. R.V.D. has previously received consultancy fees from Mainstay Medical, Medtronic, and Saluda Medical outside the submitted work. The remaining author declares no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Traeger A. Competing narratives: moving the field forward on spinal cord stimulation. Clin J Pain. 2024. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1097/AJP.0000000000001229. - DOI
    1. Eldabe S, Nevitt S, Bentley A, et al. Network meta-analysis and economic evaluation of neurostimulation interventions for chronic non-surgical refractory back pain. Clin J Pain. 2024. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1097/ajp.0000000000001223 - DOI
    1. Chaimani A, Salanti G, Leucht S, et al. Common pitfalls and mistakes in the set-up, analysis and interpretation of results in network meta-analysis: what clinicians should look for in a published article. Evid Based Ment Health. 2017;20:88–94.
    1. Traeger AC, Gilbert SE, Harris IA, et al. Spinal cord stimulation for low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;3:CD014789.
    1. Hara S, Andresen H, Solheim O, et al. Effect of spinal cord burst stimulation vs placebo stimulation on disability in patients with chronic radicular pain after lumbar spine surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2022;328:1506–1514.

LinkOut - more resources