In Reply
- PMID: 39024611
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005655
In Reply
Conflict of interest statement
Financial Disclosure: The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Main EK, Fuller M, Kovacheva VP, Elkhateb R, Azar K, Caldwell M, et al. Performance characteristics of sepsis screening tools during delivery admissions. Obstet Gynecol 2024;143:326–35. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005477 - DOI
-
- Shields AD, Tse BC. Finding the needle in the haystack: challenges and future directions in maternal sepsis recognition. Obstet Gynecol 2024;143:323–5. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005513 - DOI
-
- Stovitz SD, Thompson JA, Demmer RT. Beware of the differing definitions for the false-positive rate. Am Fam Physician 2021;103:7–8.
-
- Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315:801–10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287 - DOI
-
- Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine SMFM, Shields AD, Plante LA, Pacheco LD, Louis JM. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #67: maternal sepsis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2023;229:B2–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.05.019 - DOI
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources