Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 19;46(1):26.
doi: 10.1186/s40902-024-00437-6.

Anatomic and functional masseter muscle adaptation following orthognathic surgery-MRI analysis in 3 years of follow-up

Affiliations

Anatomic and functional masseter muscle adaptation following orthognathic surgery-MRI analysis in 3 years of follow-up

Fernando Duarte et al. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Orthodontic and surgical technical advances in recent years have resulted in treatment opportunities for a whole range of craniofacial skeletal disorders either in the adolescent or adult patient. In the growing child, these can include myofunctional orthodontic appliance therapy or distraction osteogenesis procedures, while in the adult, the mainstay approach revolves around orthognathic surgery. The literature agrees that for a change in craniofacial morphology to remain stable, the muscles acting upon the facial skeleton must be capable of adaptation in their structure and, therefore, their function. Failure of the muscles to adapt to the change in their length or orientation will place undesirable forces on the muscle attachments leading to potential instability of the skeleton. Adaptation can occur through various processes including those within the neuromuscular feedback mechanism, through changes within muscle structure or through altered muscle physiology, and through changes at the muscle/bone interface. It is now accepted that because there is no single method of assessing masticatory function, several measures should be taken, and whenever possible, simultaneously.

Methods: This investigation was designed to apply several, newly developed and more sophisticated methods of measuring muscle structure and function to a situation where adaptation of muscle is pivotal to the success of a therapeutic approach. Patients attending the combined orthodontic/orthognathic surgery clinic at the Clitrofa - Centro Médico, Dentário e Cirúrgico, in Trofa, Portugal, were screened. Ten patients scheduled for a bimaxillary osteotomy involving a combination of maxillary Le Fort I impaction procedure coupled with a sagittal split advancement of the mandible were selected to form the study group. The patients have MRI of the masseter muscle to evaluate the masseter muscle volume and fibre orientation changes. This exam was taken before surgery (T0), 6 to 12 months after surgery (T1), and 3 years after surgery (T2), by two independent observers, according to the protocol jointly developed between the Eastman Dental Institute - University of London and the MRI Centre - Department of Radiology at John Radcliffe Hospital - University of Oxford.

Results: Significant differences (p < 0.05) have been identified between Time 0 (pre-op) and Time 1 (6-12 months post-op) regarding the masseter area (mm2). The differences against Time 0 (pre-op) seem to disappear at Time 2 (3 years post-op).

Conclusions: MRI therefore seems to be a valid tool for measuring differences in the masseter muscle area and volume associated with high-severity occlusal deformities, although showing not to be as efficient in detecting the same differences in cases of low-severity occlusal deformities.

Keywords: MRI analysis; Masseter muscle fibres; Orthognathic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Identification of masseter muscle limits in a sagittal plane
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Final images from the left masseter muscle reconstruction using Anatomics™ software
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Experimental design used in the present work

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Singh A, Nelson-Moon ZL, Thomas GJ, Hunt NP, Lewis MP. Identification of matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors type 1 and 2 in human masseter muscle. Arch Oral Biol. 2000;45(6):431–440. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9969(00)00020-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pan Y, Chen S, Shen L, Pei Y, Zhang Y, Xu T. Thickness change of masseter muscles and the surrounding soft tissues in female patients during orthodontic treatment: a retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01168-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Youssef RE, Throckmorton GS, Ellis E, 3rd, Sinn DP. Comparison of habitual masticatory cycles and muscle activity before and after orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;55(7):699–707; discussion 707-8. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(97)90581-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coclici A, Hedeşiu M, Bran S, Băciuţ M, Dinu C, Rotaru H, Roman R. Early and long-term changes in the muscles of the mandible following orthognathic surgery. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(9):3437–3444. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03019-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tate GS, Throckmorton GS, Ellis E, 3rd, Sinn DP. Masticatory performance, muscle activity, and occlusal force in preorthognathic surgery patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994;52(5):476–81; discussion 482. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(94)90344-1. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources