Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 18;5(1):78.
doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00617-5.

Prioritizing research needs and opportunities at the intersection of implementation science and engagement science

Aubrey Villalobos  1 , Elizabeth Reynolds  2 , Sean N Halpin  2 , Sara R Jacobs  2 , Holly L Peay  2
Affiliations

Prioritizing research needs and opportunities at the intersection of implementation science and engagement science

Aubrey Villalobos et al. Implement Sci Commun. .

Abstract

Background: There has been increased attention to the need for, and the positive impact of, engaged or participatory science in recent years. Implementation scientists have an opportunity to leverage and contribute to engagement science (ES) through the systematic integration of engagement into implementation science (IS). The purpose of this study was to gather information from researchers and others to develop a prioritized list of research needs and opportunities at the intersection of IS and ES.

Methods: We conducted three Zoom-based focus groups with 20 researchers to generate a list of unmet needs, barriers, and to describe normative themes about use of ES and IS. Then a panel of nine experts in IS and/or engagement ranked the needs and barriers using a survey and met via a Zoom meeting to discuss and generate research opportunities and questions, with reference to the focus group outputs.

Results: Respondents and experts concurred on the importance of engagement in IS. Focus group participants reported 28 needs and barriers under the themes of 1) need for best practice guidance related to engagement processes and outcomes and 2) structural barriers to integrating ES in IS. The expert panel prioritized six structural barriers and four barriers related to generating best practice guidance, with corresponding recommendations on research opportunities. Example research opportunities related to engagement processes included: define "successful" engagement in IS contexts; adapt engagement tools and best practices from other disciplines into IS. Example research opportunities related to outcomes included: assess the impact of engagement on IS outcomes; examine engagement practices that lead to optimal engaged research. Example research opportunities related to structural barriers included: leverage research evidence to create structural changes needed to expand support for engaged IS; examine factors that influence institutional buy-in of engagement in IS.

Conclusions: Research needs exist that relate to engagement processes, outcomes, and structural barriers, even for scientists who value engaged research. Expert panelists recommended sequential and reinforcing research opportunities that implementation and engagement scientists can tackle together to advance both fields and health equity. Future work should assess insights from broader invested parties, particularly patients and community members.

Keywords: Community engagement; Engagement outcomes; Engagement processes; Health equity; Implementation collaboration; Research needs; Research opportunities; Research priorities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Ranking activity example
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Sequential and reinforcing nature of ES in IS
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. National Cancer Institute. About Implementation Science 2022 updated August 04, 2022. Available from: https://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/is/about.
    1. Holt CL, Chambers DA. Opportunities and challenges in conducting community-engaged dissemination/implementation research. Transl Behav Med. 2017;7(3):389–92. 10.1007/s13142-017-0520-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Villalobos A, Blachman-Demner D, Percy-Laurry A, Belis D, Bhattacharya M. Community and partner engagement in dissemination and implementation research at the National Institutes of Health: an analysis of recently funded studies and opportunities to advance the field. Implement Sci Commun. 2023;4(1):77. 10.1186/s43058-023-00462-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baumann AA, Long PD. Equity in Implementation Science Is Long Overdue. Stanf Soc Innov Rev. 2021;19(3):A15–7.
    1. Brownson RC, Kumanyika SK, Kreuter MW, Haire-Joshu D. Implementation science should give higher priority to health equity. Implement Sci. 2021;16(1):28. 10.1186/s13012-021-01097-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources