Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 17:13:488.
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.145852.1. eCollection 2024.

Polarization and health-related behaviours and outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review protocol

Aziz Mert Ipekci  1   2   3 , Maximilian Filsinger  2   4 , Diana Buitrago-Garcia  3 , Cristopher I Kobler Betancourt  1   2   3 , Annika Frahsa  2   3 , Nicola Low  2   3
Affiliations

Polarization and health-related behaviours and outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review protocol

Aziz Mert Ipekci et al. F1000Res. .

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic affected people's health behaviours and health outcomes. Political or affective polarization could be associated with health behaviours such as mask-wearing or vaccine uptake and with health outcomes, e.g., infection or mortality rate. Political polarization relates to divergence or spread of ideological beliefs and affective polarization is about dislike between people of different political groups, such as ideologies or parties. The objectives of this study are to investigate and synthesize evidence about associations between both forms of polarization and COVID-19 health behaviours and outcomes.

Methods: In this systematic review, we will include quantitative studies that assess the relationship between political or affective polarization and COVID-19-related behaviours and outcomes, including adherence to mask mandates, vaccine uptake, infection and mortality rate. We will use a predetermined strategy to search EMBASE, Medline (Ovid), Cochrane Library, Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register, Global Health (Ovid), PsycInfo (Ovid), Web of Science, CINAHL, EconLit (EBSCOhost), WHO COVID-19 Database, iSearch COVID-19 Portfolio (NIH) and Google Scholar from 2019 to September 8 2023. One reviewer will screen unique records according to eligibility criteria. A second reviewer will verify the selection. Data extraction, using pre-piloted electronic forms, will follow a similar process. The risk of bias of the included studies will be assessed using the JBI checklist for analytical cross sectional studies. We will summarise the included studies descriptively and examine the heterogeneity between studies. Quantitative data pooling might not be feasible due to variations in measurement methods used to evaluate exposure, affective and political polarization. If there are enough relevant studies for statistical data synthesis, we will conduct a meta-analysis.

Discussion: This review will help to better understand the concept of polarization in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and might inform decision making for future pandemics.

Protocol registration: PROSPERO ID: CRD42023475828.

Keywords: COVID-19; Systematic review; affective-polarization; infection-risk; mortality.; political-polarization; social-distancing; vaccination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing interests were disclosed.

References

    1. Albrecht D: Vaccination, politics and COVID-19 impacts. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1–12. 10.1186/s12889-021-12432-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hearne BN, Niño MD: Understanding how race, ethnicity, and gender shape mask-wearing adherence during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from the COVID impact survey. J. Racial Ethn. Health Disparities. 2021;9:176–183. 10.1007/s40615-020-00941-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Unruh LH, Dharmapuri S, Xia Y, et al. : Health disparities and COVID-19: A retrospective study examining individual and community factors causing disproportionate COVID-19 outcomes in Cook County, Illinois. PLoS One. 2022;17(5):e0268317. 10.1371/journal.pone.0268317 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gadarian SK, Goodman SW, Pepinsky TB: Partisanship, health behavior, and policy attitudes in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One. 2021;16(4):e0249596. 10.1371/journal.pone.0249596 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bartels LM: Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Polit. Behav. 2002;24:117–150. 10.1023/A:1021226224601 - DOI