Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 5;59(Suppl 1):e78-e82.
doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735142. eCollection 2024 Jul.

Custom-made Trabecular Metal Acetabular Component in Total Hip Revision

Affiliations

Custom-made Trabecular Metal Acetabular Component in Total Hip Revision

Roberto Dantas Queiroz et al. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). .

Abstract

The following case report aims to demonstrate a total hip arthroplasty revision surgery (THARS) using a custom-made trabecular metal acetabular component for correction of a severe acetabular defect. Currently, in the literature, there are few complete descriptions of surgical planning and procedures involving customized prostheses. This is due to the inherent technical difficulty of the surgical procedure and the high costs related to the planning and materials.

Keywords: 3D printing; acetabulum; arthroplasty, replacement, hip; hip prosthesis; titanium.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflito de Interesses Os autores declaram não haver conflito de interesses e que o artigo foi realizado com o intuito de informar e demonstrar um procedimento cirúrgico raro.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
( A ) Computed tomography; ( B ) materialize; ( C ) segregation of the desired part; ( D ) 3D printing of the remaining bone; ( E ) 3D printing of the new component – acetabular component; ( F ) Customized acetabular component.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
( A ) Preoperative radiography; ( B ) removed acetabular component; ( C ) intraoperatively; ( D ) intraoperative total hip arthroplasty revision surgery; ( E ) postoperative radiography.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
( A ) Tomografia computadorizada; ( B ) Materialise; ( C ) Segregação da parte desejada; ( D ) Impressão 3D do osso remanescente; ( E ) Impressão 3D do novo componente- componente acetabular; ( F ) Componente acetabular customizado.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
( A ) Radiografia pré-operatória; ( B ) componente acetabular retirado; ( C ) intraoperatório; ( D ) revisão de artroplastia total do quadril intraoperatória; ( E ) Radiografia pós-operatória.

References

    1. Paprosky W G, Perona P G, Lawrence J M. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty. 1994;9(01):33–44. - PubMed
    1. Canale S T, Beaty J H. 12ª. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2017. Campbell cirurgia ortopédica.
    1. Van Kleunen J P, Lee G C, Lementowski P W, Nelson C L, Garino J P.Acetabular revisions using trabecular metal cups and augments J Arthroplasty 200924(6, Suppl):64–68. - PubMed
    1. Beckmann N A, Weiss S, Klotz M C, Gondan M, Jaeger S, Bitsch R G. Loosening after acetabular revision: comparison of trabecular metal and reinforcement rings. A systematic review. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(01):229–235. - PubMed
    1. Tack P, Victor J, Gemmel P, Annemans L.DDo custom 3D-printed revision acetabular implants provide enough value to justify the additional costs? The health-economic comparison of a new porous 3D-printed hip implant for revision arthroplasty of Paprosky type 3B acetabular defects and its closest alternativeOrthop Traumatol Surg Res 2021 Feb;107(01):102600. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.03.012. Epub 2020 May 11. PMID: 32409268a - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources