Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 3;15(28):10784-10793.
doi: 10.1039/d4sc02841d. eCollection 2024 Jul 17.

Fast, efficient, narrowband room-temperature phosphorescence from metal-free 1,2-diketones: rational design and the mechanism

Affiliations

Fast, efficient, narrowband room-temperature phosphorescence from metal-free 1,2-diketones: rational design and the mechanism

Yosuke Tani et al. Chem Sci. .

Abstract

We report metal-free organic 1,2-diketones that exhibit fast and highly efficient room-temperature phosphorescence (RTP) with high colour purity under various conditions, including solutions. RTP quantum yields reached 38.2% in solution under Ar, 54% in a polymer matrix in air, and 50% in crystalline solids in air. Moreover, the narrowband RTP consistently dominated the steady-state emission, regardless of the molecular environment. Detailed mechanistic studies using ultrafast spectroscopy, single-crystal X-ray structure analysis, and theoretical calculations revealed picosecond intersystem crossing (ISC) followed by RTP from a planar conformation. Notably, the phosphorescence rate constant k p was unambiguously established as ∼5000 s-1, which is comparable to that of platinum porphyrins (representative heavy-metal phosphor). This inherently large k p enabled the high-efficiency RTP across diverse molecular environments, thus complementing the streamlined persistent RTP approach. The mechanism behind the photofunction has been elucidated as follows: (1) the large k p is due to efficient intensity borrowing of the T1 state from the bright S3 state, (2) the rapid ISC occurs from the S1 to the T3 state because these states are nearly isoenergetic and have a considerable spin-orbit coupling, and (3) the narrowband emission results from the minimal geometry change between the T1 and S0 states. Such mechanistic understanding based on molecular orbitals, as well as the structure-RTP property relationship study, highlighted design principles embodied by the diketone planar conformer. The fast RTP strategy enables development of organic phosphors with emissions independent of environmental conditions, thereby offering alternatives to precious-metal based phosphors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Comparison of representative metal-free organic phosphors (blue filled circles), thiocarbonyls (blue open circles), and 1 (orange diamonds) in solution. (a) Molecular structures of 1. (b) Room-temperature phosphorescence quantum yields (Φp) vs. lifetimes (τp); (c) full-width-at-half-maxima (FWHM) vs. Φp. Blue and orange broken lines in (b) represent kp = 100 and 5000 s−1, respectively, assuming unity intersystem crossing quantum yields.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. (a) Steady-state photoluminescence spectra of 1a in cyclohexane (4.4 × 10−6 M, excited at 368 nm). (b) Photograph of solutions under 365 nm excitation. (c) fs transient absorption spectra of 1a in cyclohexane excited at 355 nm. (d and e) Selected results from the global analysis based on a sequential model; (d) evolution-associated spectra and (e) corresponding concentration kinetics. Coherent artefact signals are omitted for clarity. (f) Schematic summary of the excited-state dynamics in 1a.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. (a) Steady-state photoluminescence (PL) spectra of 1a–1c in cyclohexane (10–4.4 × 10−6 M, excited at 368 nm) and (b) CIE1931 chromaticity diagram for their PL in cyclohexane. (c) Photophysical properties of 1a–1c in cyclohexane under Ar (10–4.4 × 10−6 M, excited at 368 nm). Φp, RTP quantum yields; FWHM, full-width-at-half-maxima; λem, emission maxima; τp, lifetimes; kp and knr, phosphorescence and nonradiative rate constants. (d and g) Steady-state PL spectra of (d) 1a–1c@PMMA (5 wt%, excited at 355–368 nm) and (g) a 1c crystal in cyclohexane (1.0 × 10−5 M, excited at 368 nm). (e and h) Photographs of (e) 1b@PMMA and (h) a 1c crystal under 365 nm excitation. (f) Φp in air and the FWHM of 1b-doped polymer films (5 wt%, excited at 350–375 nm). (i) ORTEP drawing of the crystal structure of 1c. Thermal ellipsoids are set at the 50% probability level.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Energy diagram of 1a in the S1-optimized trans-planar (TP) geometry. Energies and the spin–orbit coupling matrix element between the S1 and T3 states 〈S1|HSO|T3〉 were calculated at the TDA/uCAM-B3LYP-D3/6-311G(d) level of theory.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. (a) Energy diagram of 1a in the T1-optimized trans-planar (TP) geometry depicting the principal intensity-borrowing. Energies, the transition dipole moment μS3–S0, and the spin–orbit coupling matrix element 〈S3|HSO|T1〉 were calculated at the TDA/(u)CAM-B3LYP-D3/6-311G(d) level. (b) Principal natural transition orbitals (NTOs) for S3–S0 (left) and T1–S0 (right) transitions.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. (a) Chemical structures of 1a, 2a, and 3a, and their Φp, estimated kp, steady-state photoluminescence spectra, and the corresponding FWHM in cyclohexane (1.0 × 10−5 M, 2.6 × 10−3 M, and 1.0 × 10−4 M, respectively) excited at 368 nm under Ar. kp was derived as kp = Φp/τp, assuming ϕISC = 1. (b) Calculated factors of kp for 1a–3a. (c) Franck–Condon analysis of the emission spectra of 1a (left) and 2a (right). Huang–Rhys (HR) factors were 0.51 and 2.22, respectively. (d) Bond-elongation ratio between the optimized geometries in the S0 and T1 states of 1a and 2a. (e) Natural transition orbitals of the T1 states for 1a and 2a.

References

    1. Hirata S. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2017;5:1700116. doi: 10.1002/adom.201700116. - DOI
    2. Kenry Chen C. Liu B. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:2111. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chou P.-T. Chi Y. Chem.–Eur. J. 2007;13:380–395. - PubMed
    2. Zhao Q. Huang C. Li F. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011;40:2508–2524. - PubMed
    3. Fan C. Yang C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014;43:6439–6469. - PubMed
    4. Tan C.-P. Zhong Y.-M. Ji L.-N. Mao Z.-W. Chem. Sci. 2021;12:2357–2367. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bouskila A. Drahi B. Amouyal E. Sasaki I. Gaudemer A. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A. 2004;163:381–388. - PubMed
    2. Bansal A. K. Holzer W. Penzkofer A. Tsuboi T. Chem. Phys. 2006;330:118–129.
    3. Endo A. Suzuki K. Yoshihara T. Tobita S. Yahiro M. Adachi C. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008;460:155–157.
    4. Sommer J. R. Shelton A. H. Parthasarathy A. Ghiviriga I. Reynolds J. R. Schanze K. S. Chem. Mater. 2011;23:5296–5304.
    1. Turro N. J., Ramamurthy V. and Scaiano J. C., Principles of Molecular Photochemistry: An Introduction, University Science Books, Sausalito, CA, 2009
    2. Konstantin N. S. e. Elena A. B. Phys.-Usp. 2005;48:231.
    3. Kasha M. J. Chem. Phys. 1952;20:71–74.
    4. McClure D. S. J. Chem. Phys. 1949;17:905–913.
    5. Kearns D. R. Case W. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966;88:5087–5097.
    1. Donkerbroek J. J. Elzas J. J. Gooijer C. Frei R. W. Velthorst N. H. Talanta. 1981;28:717–723. - PubMed
    2. Xu J. Takai A. Kobayashi Y. Takeuchi M. Chem. Commun. 2013;49:8447–8449. - PubMed
    3. Ventura B. Bertocco A. Braga D. Catalano L. d'Agostino S. Grepioni F. Taddei P. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2014;118:18646–18658. doi: 10.1021/jp5049309. - DOI
    4. Gutierrez G. D. Sazama G. T. Wu T. Baldo M. A. Swager T. M. J. Org. Chem. 2016;81:4789–4796. - PMC - PubMed
    5. Yu Z. Wu Y. Xiao L. Chen J. Liao Q. Yao J. Fu H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:6376–6381. - PubMed
    6. Shu H. Li H. Rao J. Chen L. Wang X. Wu X. Tian H. Tong H. Wang L. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2020;8:14360–14364. doi: 10.1039/D0TC04070C. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources