Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Aug;17(8):e010396.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010396. Epub 2024 Jul 19.

Role of Health Care Professionals in the Success of Blood Pressure Control Interventions in Patients With Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Role of Health Care Professionals in the Success of Blood Pressure Control Interventions in Patients With Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis

Katherine T Mills et al. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Globally, only 13.8% of patients with hypertension have their blood pressure (BP) controlled. Trials testing interventions to overcome barriers to BP control have produced mixed results. Type of health care professional delivering the intervention may play an important role in intervention success. The goal of this meta-analysis is to determine which health care professionals are most effective at delivering BP reduction interventions.

Methods: We searched Medline and Embase (until December 2023) for randomized controlled trials of interventions targeting barriers to hypertension control reporting who led intervention delivery. One hundred articles worldwide with 116 comparisons and 90 474 participants with hypertension were included. Trials were grouped by health care professional, and the effects of the intervention on systolic and diastolic BP were combined using random effects models and generalized estimating equations.

Results: Pharmacist-led interventions , community health worker-led interventions, and health educator-led interventions resulted in the greatest systolic BP reductions of -7.3 (95% CI, -9.1 to -5.6), -7.1 (95% CI, -10.8 to -3.4), and -5.2 (95% CI, -7.8 to -2.6) mm Hg, respectively. Interventions led by multiple health care professionals, nurses, and physicians also resulted in significant systolic BP reductions of -4.2 (95% CI, -6.1 to -2.4), -3.0 (95% CI, -4.2 to -1.9), and -2.4 (95% CI, -3.4 to -1.5) mm Hg, respectively. Similarly, the greatest diastolic BP reductions were -3.9 (95% CI, -5.2 to -2.5) mm Hg for pharmacist-led and -3.7 (95% CI, -6.6 to -0.8) mm Hg for community health worker-led interventions. In pairwise comparisons, pharmacist were significantly more effective than multiple health care professionals, nurses, and physicians at delivering interventions.

Conclusions: Pharmacists and community health workers are most effective at leading BP intervention implementation and should be prioritized in future hypertension control efforts.

Keywords: blood pressure; cardiovascular diseases; health personnel; hypertension; risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flowchart of Study Selection
BP – blood pressure
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Mean Net Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction and 95% Confidence Intervals by Healthcare Professional
(A) Pharmacist, (B) Community Health Worker, (C) Health Educator, (D) Multiple Healthcare Professionals, (E) Nurse, and (F) Physician
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Mean Net Diastolic Blood Pressure Reduction and 95% Confidence Intervals by Healthcare Professional
(A) Pharmacist, (B) Community Health Worker, (C) Health Educator, (D) Multiple Healthcare Professionals, (E) Nurse, and (F) Physician
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Adjusted Mean Net Systolic (A) and Diastolic (B) Blood Pressure Reduction Associated with Healthcare Professional Delivering the Intervention
BP – blood pressure Adjusted for sex, age, baseline BP, trial duration, type of control group, and other healthcare professional categories. Boxes are weighted by sample size.

Comment in

References

    1. Stanaway JD, Afshin A, Gakidou E, Lim SS, Abate D, Abate KH, Abbafati C, Abbasi N, Abbastabar H, Abd-Allah F, et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392:1923–1994. - PMC - PubMed
    1. GBD Causes of Death Collaborators, Abate D, Abate KH, Abay SM, Abbafati C, Abbasi N, Abbastabar H, Abd-Allah F, Abdela J, Abdelalim A, et al. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392:1736–1788. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mills KT, Bundy JD, Kelly TN, Reed JE, Kearney PM, Reynolds K, Chen J, He J. Global Disparities of Hypertension Prevalence and Control. Circulation. 2016;134:441–450. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walsh JM, Sundaram V, McDonald K, Owens DK, Goldstein MK. Implementing effective hypertension quality improvement strategies: barriers and potential solutions. Journal of Clinical Hypertension (Greenwich, Conn). 2008;10:311–316. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borzecki AM, Oliveria SA, Berlowitz DR. Barriers to hypertension control. American Heart Journal. 2005;149:785–794. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances