Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jul 20.
doi: 10.1007/s11764-024-01643-x. Online ahead of print.

Models of survivorship care in patients with head and neck cancer in regional, rural, and remote areas: a systematic review

Poorva Pradhan  1 , Ashleigh R Sharman  1   2 , Carsten E Palme  1   3 , Michael S Elliott  1   3 , Jonathan R Clark  1   3   4 , Rebecca L Venchiarutti  5   6
Affiliations
Review

Models of survivorship care in patients with head and neck cancer in regional, rural, and remote areas: a systematic review

Poorva Pradhan et al. J Cancer Surviv. .

Abstract

Purpose: Rural people with head and neck cancers (HNC) are likely to experience poorer health outcomes due to limited access to health services, so many benefit from models of care that account for rurality. The aim of this review was to synthesise literature on models of care in this population.

Methods: Studies were identified using seven databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, Medline, and Web of Science. Studies that tested or reported a model of care in rural HNC survivors were included. Data on characteristics and outcomes of the models were synthesised according to the domains in the Cancer Survivorship Care Quality Framework, and study quality was appraised.

Results: Seventeen articles were included. Eight were randomised controlled trials (seven with a control group and one single-arm study). Three models were delivered online, nine via telehealth, and five in-person. Majority were led by nurses and allied health specialists and most addressed management of physical (n = 9) and psychosocial effects (n = 6), while only a few assessed implementation outcomes such as cost-effectiveness. None evaluated the management of chronic health conditions.

Conclusion: Positive outcomes were reported for domains of survivorship care that were measured; however, further evaluation of models of care for rural people with HNC is needed to assess effectiveness across all domains of care.

Implications for cancer survivors: Rural cancer survivors are a diverse population with unique needs. Alternative models of care such as shared care, or models personalised to the individual, could be considered to reduce disparities in access to care and outcomes.

Keywords: Cancer survivorship; Head and neck cancer; Models of care; Neoplasm; Oncology; Rural health.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. WHO (World Health Organization). Cancer factsheets; all cancers. 2022. Retrieved May 2023. https://www.uicc.org/news/globocan-2022-latest-global-cancer-data-shows-... . Accessed 12 Apr 2024.
    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lin BM, Wang H, D’Souza G, et al. Long-term prognosis and risk factors among patients with HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2013;119(19):3462–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28250 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Head and neck cancers in Australia. Cancer series no. 83. Cat. no. CAN 80. Canberra: AIHW. 2014. https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/bdccebf2-dbe6-44e2-9104-8461d7e7c165/16... .
    1. Ringash J, Bernstein LJ, Devins G, et al. Head and neck cancer survivorship: learning the needs, meeting the needs. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2018;28(1):64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semradonc.2017.08.008 . - DOI - PubMed