Routine maneuvers in eutocic breech vaginal delivery at term: A prospective cohort study
- PMID: 39033314
- DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.15767
Routine maneuvers in eutocic breech vaginal delivery at term: A prospective cohort study
Abstract
Objective: To study neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with routine maneuvers in breech vaginal delivery at term.
Methods: This was a secondary analysis of the multicenter PREMODA observational prospective study in France and Belgium. We included women with vaginal breech delivery, excluding those who underwent maneuvers to resolve a dystocic delivery. Maternal data and characteristics of labor, in addition to neonatal and maternal outcomes, were recorded. We defined two groups according to mode of delivery; breech vaginal delivery with or without routine maneuvers, and we compared the variables between the groups. To assess the factors associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, a multivariate logistic regression with adjustment for confounders was performed.
Results: Of the 2502 women with planned vaginal deliveries, 1794 were delivered vaginally, 606 of whom were excluded from the study due to maneuvers performed for dystocia. A total of 25 other patients were excluded as a result of missing data. A total of 537 women were included in the routine maneuvers group and 626 women in the no maneuvers group. Adverse perinatal outcome was similar for the two groups (4.5% vs 5.0%, P = 0.65) and no neonatal deaths were reported. Third degree perineal tear and postpartum hemorrhage >1 L rates were comparable for the two groups. After adjustment, the factors associated with adverse perinatal outcomes were primiparity and birth weight <2500 g.
Conclusion: Routine maneuvers were not associated with an increase in neonatal morbidity in our population.
Keywords: breech presentation; breech vaginal delivery; maternal morbidity; neonatal morbidity; routine maneuvers; vaginal breech maneuvers.
© 2024 The Author(s). International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2000;356:1375‐1383. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02840-3
-
- Hogle KL, Kilburn L, Hewson S, Gafni A, Wall R, Hannah ME. Impact of the international term breech trial on clinical practice and concerns: a survey of centre collaborators. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2003;25:14‐16. doi:10.1016/S1701-2163(16)31077-5
-
- Alexandersson O, Bixo M, Högberg U. Evidence‐based changes in term breech delivery practice in Sweden: term breech delivery practice in Sweden. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84:584‐587. doi:10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00534.x
-
- Goffinet F, Blondel B, Bréart G. Breach presentation: questions raised by the controlled trial by Hannah et al. on systematic use of cesarean section for breach presentations. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2001;30:187‐190.
-
- RCOG. Management of Breech Presentation: Green‐top Guideline No. 20b. BJOG. 2017;124:e151‐e177. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.14465
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical