Rescue extracranial vertebral stenting in tandem occlusions: A preliminary Vietnamese study
- PMID: 39034279
- PMCID: PMC11571124
- DOI: 10.1177/15910199241264342
Rescue extracranial vertebral stenting in tandem occlusions: A preliminary Vietnamese study
Abstract
Background and purpose: The acute vertebrobasilar occlusion associated with the poor prognosis, particularly tandem occlusion. However, few data on the efficacy of the endovascular therapy was indicated in this occlusion. We investigated whether the additional rescue extracranial vertebral stenting improved clinical outcome by modified Rankin scale (mRS) score within 3 months after the procedure.
Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of patients with acute posterior tandem occlusion who were treated with rescue extracranial vertebral stenting between December 2020 and January 2024 at our hospital. Clinical, neuroimaging, procedural, and complication data were collected. Primary outcomes included the rate of good outcomes (mRS ≤ 2) at 3-month follow-up.
Results: Nine patients who underwent rescue extracranial vertebral stenting in posterior circulation tandem occlusions were enrolled in the study. All patients were achieved the successful recanalization (mTICI ≥ 2b). Of Dotter technique in the "distal-to-proximal" approach, Diagnostic-Dotter made up 66.7%. Five patients (55.6%) with good outcome (mRS ≤ 2) at 3 months, and 1 patient (11.1%) underwent suboccipital decompressive craniectomy due to the malignant cerebellar infarction.
Conclusion: Our study suggests that despite the small series with posterior tandem occlusions, the rescue extracranial vertebral stenting could be an important alternative treatment followed by mechanical thrombectomy.
Keywords: Thrombectomy; balloon-expandable stents; extracranial arteries; ischemia; vertebrobasilar insufficiency.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Liu X, Dai Q, Ye R, et al. Endovascular treatment versus standard medical treatment for vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (BEST): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2020; 19: 115–122. pmid: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31831388. - PubMed
-
- Langezaal LCM, van der Hoeven E, Mont'Alverne FJA, et al. “Endovascular therapy for stroke due to basilar-artery occlusion”. N Engl J Med 2021; 384: 1910–1920. pmid: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34010530. - PubMed
-
- Jovin TG, Li C, Wu L, et al. Trial of thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke due to basilar-artery occlusion. N Engl J Med 2022; 387: 1373–1384. pmid: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36239645. - PubMed
-
- Tao C, Li R, Zhu Y, et al. Endovascular treatment for acute basilar artery occlusion: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (ATTENTION). Int J Stroke 2022; 17: 815–819. pmid: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35102797. - PubMed
-
- Cohen JE, Leker RR, Gomori JM, et al. Emergent revascularization of acute tandem vertebrobasilar occlusions: endovascular approaches and technical considerations-confirming the role of vertebral artery ostium stenosis as a cause of vertebrobasilar stroke. J Clin Neurosci 2016; 34: 70–76. pmid: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27522497. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
