Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 13:9:100026.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2022.100026. eCollection 2023 Jun.

Oral anticoagulation use in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in rural setting

Affiliations

Oral anticoagulation use in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in rural setting

Camille Brod et al. Am J Med Open. .

Abstract

Background: The 2019 ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines established direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as first line therapy over warfarin for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods: Ambulatory clinic patients with non-valvular AF or atrial flutter seen between 10/1/2019-7/12/2020 included. High-risk AF defined as males CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 and females ≥3. Patients were separated into: warfarin, DOAC, or no oral anticoagulation (OAC). ATRIA bleed score calculated. A provider survey assessing knowledge and barriers to anticoagulation completed via REDCap between 3/5-4/16/2020.

Results: Of 12,014 subjects with AF, 8,032 were high risk (mean age 75.9 ± 9.8 years; 57.5% male). There were 4,619 (57.1%) ≥ 75 years and 63.4% were rural dwelling. There was no significant difference between the number of subjects on anticoagulation before and after the guideline publication (75.6% vs. 75.7%, p = 0.79). Warfarin use decreased 2.3% over 1 year (39.3% to 37.0%), while DOACs increased 2.4% (36.2% to 38.7%, p < 0.001 for both). At 1-year, age, male gender, CHA2DS2-VASc score 4-6, hypertension, stroke and cardiology consult increased prescription of OAC (p<0.05). Vascular disease, high risk ATRIA bleed, renal disease, prior hemorrhage, and left atrial appendage occlusion were associated with decreased OAC use (p < 0.05). Left atrial appendage occlusion device use was low (<1%). In a survey, majority of providers noted bleeding risk (35.1%) and cost (25.0%) to be the biggest barriers to DOAC use.

Conclusions: The new guidelines caused a slight increase in DOACs over time. Significant barriers to DOAC use exist in rural areas; one in four high risk AF patient remains without OAC therapy.

Keywords: Anticoagulation; Atrial fibrillation; Atrial flutter; Barriers; Education; Outcomes; Risk; Stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of the study cohort review process and categorization of atrial fibrillation patients’ anticoagulation treatment regimens at baseline. AF indicates atrial fibrillation; NOAC, non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant; OAC, oral anticoagulation. CHA₂DS₂-VASc conditions key: C: Congestive Heart Failure, H: Hypertension, Age ≥75, D: Diabetes Mellitus, S: Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack, V: Vascular Disease, A: 65 to 74 years, S: Female.
Fig 2
Fig. 2
Example of the automatic CHA2DS2-VASc calculator and smart phrase available in the electronic health record (EHR) for providers to use. A, Sample pop-up CHA2DS2-VASc calculator. B, smart phrase available in the EHR to auto populate the recording of the CHA2DS2-VASc score into the provider's note. A) LAA indicates left atrial appendage; LV, left ventricular; MI, myocardial infarction; PAD, peripheral artery disease; TE, thromboembolism; TIA, transient ischemic attack. B) LV indicates left ventricular; MI, myocardial infarction; PAD, peripheral artery disease; TE, thromboembolism; TIA, transient ischemic attack. CHA₂DS₂-VASc conditions key: C: Congestive Heart Failure, H: Hypertension, Age ≥75, D: Diabetes Mellitus, S: Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack, V: Vascular Disease, A: 65 to 74 years, S: Female.
Fig 3
Fig. 3
Baseline prevalence of anticoagulation therapy in the study cohort (non-valvular atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter patients with a high-risk CHA2DS2-VASc score and 1-year follow-up data; N = 8,032), sorted by CHA₂DS₂-VASc score. M = male; F = female. CHA₂DS₂-VASc conditions key: C: Congestive Heart Failure, H: Hypertension, A: Age ≥75 years, D: Diabetes Mellitus, S: Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack, V: Vascular Disease, A: 65 to 74 years, S: Female sex.

References

    1. Lakshminarayan K., Anderson D.C., Herzog C.A., Qureshi A.I. Clinical epidemiology of atrial fibrillation and related cerebrovascular events in the United States. Neurologist. 2008;14(3):143–150. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Staerk L., Sherer J.A., Ko D., Benjamin E.J., Helm R.H. Atrial fibrillation: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical outcomes. Circ Res. 2017;120(9):1501–1517. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williams B.A., Chamberlain A.M., Blankenship J.C., Hylek E.M., Voyce S. Trends in atrial fibrillation incidence rates within an integrated health care delivery system, 2006 to 2018. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(8) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lippi G., Sanchis-Gomar F., Cervellin G. Global epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: an increasing epidemic and public health challenge. Int J Stroke. 2021;16(2):217–221. - PubMed
    1. Benziger C.P., Roth G.A., Moran A.E. The global burden of disease study and the preventable burden of NCD. Glob Heart. 2016;11(4):393–397. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources