Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jul 5:15:1403639.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1403639. eCollection 2024.

Urgency Theory in the context of broader emotion theories: a conceptual review

Affiliations
Review

Urgency Theory in the context of broader emotion theories: a conceptual review

Lindsey Fisher-Fox et al. Front Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Negative and positive urgency are two closely related personality traits that reflect the tendency for an individual to engage in maladaptive risk-taking in response to extreme negative and positive emotions, respectively. However, other prominent emotion theories describe how emotions contribute to adaptive, rather than maladaptive, decision-making. This conceptual review considers how Urgency Theory can be integrated with these broader existing emotion theories. We proceed as follows: a) briefly define what is meant by emotions in science and summarize basic human neuroscience underlying emotions; b) briefly describe select theories and research linking emotions to adaptive decision-making, including brain correlates of this effect; c) review Urgency Theory, including contrasting evidence that emotions lead to maladaptive outcomes and brain correlates of this effect; d) discuss how urgency can be integrated into theories that view emotions as both adaptive and maladaptive for decision-making; and e) propose future directions to advance research in this field. We identified four, not mutually exclusive, viable options to integrate Urgency Theory into existing theories: urgency as model-free emotion regulation, urgency as being driven by incidental emotions, urgency as a reflexive response to emotions, or urgency as an individual difference factor. We conclude that although all four options are viable, individual difference and model-free emotion regulation have the most empirical support to date. Importantly, the other two options are less well-researched. Direct tests comparing these integrations is necessary to determine the most accurate way to integrate urgency with existing emotion theories. We believe that this research can identify mechanisms underlying urgency and help inform future intervention and prevention development to reduce negative effects of urgency across numerous maladaptive behaviors and clinical disorders.

Keywords: adaptive; decision-making; emotions; maladaptive urgency and broader emotion theories; urgency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

    1. Frijda NH. The Emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press; (1986).
    1. Lang PJ. The motivational organization of emotion: Affect reflex connections. In: van Goozen S, van der Poll NE, Sergeant JA, editors. The Emotions: Essays on Emotion Theory. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ: (1993). p. 61–96.
    1. Saami C, Mumme DL, Campos JJ. Emotional development: Action, communication, and understanding. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc; (1998).
    1. Bechara A. The role of emotion in decision-making: Evidence from neurological patients with orbitofrontal damage. Brain Cogn. (2004) 55:30–40. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2003.04.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mohr PNC, Biele G, Heekeren HR. Neural processing of risk. J Neurosci. (2010) 30:6613–9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0003-10.2010 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources