Predictive value of drain fluid amylase level on postoperative day one after pancreatic resection for predicting postoperative pancreatic fistula
- PMID: 39036006
- PMCID: PMC11257726
- DOI: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6292
Predictive value of drain fluid amylase level on postoperative day one after pancreatic resection for predicting postoperative pancreatic fistula
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of the first postoperative day (POD1) drain fluid amylase in predicting pancreatic fistula formation following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).
Material and methods: One-hundred and eighty-five prospective patients undergoing PD between April 2014 and April 2018 were studied retrospectively. Cut-off point to predict the development of POPF was determined by median values for drain fluid amylase of 1883 U/L. Patients were classified into two groups according to POD1 drain fluid amylase values: <1883 U/L (Group 1) and ≥1883 U/L (Group 2). Differences between the groups with clinically relevant POPF and without POPF were evaluated.
Results: The incidence of POPF was 17.2%. POD1 amylase level was the strongest predictor of POPF, with levels of higher than 1883 U/L demonstrating the best accuracy (87.5%), sensitivity (78.1%), specificity (89.5%), positive predictive value (60.9%), and negative predictive value (95.1%). One-hundred and forty-four patients (77.8%) had a POD1 drain amylase level of less than 1883 U/L, and POPF developed in only seven (3.7%) cases, whereas in patients with POD1 drain amylase level of 1883 U/L or higher (n= 41), the POPF rate was 31.4% [OR: 22.24, 95% CI (7.930-62.396), p<0.001].
Conclusion: The cut-off point of POD1 drain fluid amylase level (1883 U/L) might predict the clinically relevant POPF with adequate sensitivity and specificity rates in patients undergoing pancreatic resection.
Keywords: Pancreaticoduodenectomy; amylases; pancreatic fistula; postoperative complications.
Copyright © 2024, Turkish Surgical Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Similar articles
-
The role of abdominal drainage in pancreatic resection - A multicenter validation study for early drain removal.Pancreatology. 2019 Sep;19(6):888-896. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2019.07.041. Epub 2019 Jul 27. Pancreatology. 2019. PMID: 31378583
-
Serum Creatinine and Amylase in Drain to Predict Pancreatic Fistula Risk after Pancreatoduodenectomy.Dig Surg. 2023;40(6):205-215. doi: 10.1159/000533869. Epub 2023 Oct 20. Dig Surg. 2023. PMID: 37866358 Free PMC article.
-
The value of drain fluid amylase as a predictor of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticogastrostomy.ANZ J Surg. 2022 Mar;92(3):419-425. doi: 10.1111/ans.17399. Epub 2021 Nov 30. ANZ J Surg. 2022. PMID: 34850520
-
Meta-analysis of drain amylase content on postoperative day 1 as a predictor of pancreatic fistula following pancreatic resection.Br J Surg. 2016 Mar;103(4):328-36. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10090. Epub 2016 Jan 21. Br J Surg. 2016. PMID: 26791838 Review.
-
Predictive value of abdominal drain amylase for postoperative pancreatic fistula following gastric resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jun;47(6):1244-1251. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.12.005. Epub 2020 Dec 13. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33334630
Cited by
-
Intraparenchymal Penicillin G Injection Promotes Wound Healing and Lowers POPF in Pigs After Pancreatic Surgery.Biomedicines. 2025 Mar 6;13(3):650. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13030650. Biomedicines. 2025. PMID: 40149626 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, Ng KK, Yuen WK, Yeung C, et al. External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent to reduce leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246:425–433. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181492c28. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Diener MK, Tadjalli-Mehr K, Wente MN, Kieser M, Büchler MW, Seiler CM. Risk-benefit assessment of closed intra-abdominal drains after pancreatic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the current state of evidence. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011;396:41–52. doi: 10.1007/s00423-010-0716-0. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous