The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act and workplace genetic testing: Knowledge and perceptions of employed adults in the United States
- PMID: 39037108
- PMCID: PMC11751123
- DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1945
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act and workplace genetic testing: Knowledge and perceptions of employed adults in the United States
Abstract
Workplace wellness programs are an emerging avenue for health-related genetic testing, with some large employers now offering such testing to employees. Employees' knowledge and concerns regarding genetic discrimination may impact their decision-making about and uptake of workplace genetic testing (wGT). This study describes employed adults' objective knowledge of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) and evaluates how this knowledge correlates with attitudes and beliefs regarding wGT. Analyses utilized data from a large, national web-based survey of employed adults (N = 2000; mean age = 43 years; 51% female; 55.2% college educated). Overall, most respondents (57.3%) said they were unaware of any laws protecting against genetic discrimination. Specifically, 62.6% indicated they were not at all familiar with GINA. The primary study outcome was respondents' score on a 13-item measure assessing knowledge of basic facts about GINA. Participants had low overall GINA knowledge (M = 4.6/13 items correct (35%), SD = 2.9), with employees often presuming GINA offers greater legal protections than it does (e.g., 45.3% erroneously endorsed that GINA protected against discrimination in life insurance). Logistic regression analyses assessed associations between GINA knowledge and employees' demographic characteristics, prior experience with genetic testing, and attitudes regarding wGT. Variables significantly associated with GINA knowledge included higher interest in wGT (aOR = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.20, 1.77), self-reported familiarity with GINA (aOR = 2.02; 95% CI: 1.64, 2.50), and favorable attitudes toward wGT (aOR = 1.92; 95% CI: 1.52, 2.44). Results indicate public knowledge of GINA remains low over 15 years after its passage. These findings highlight the need for employee education on GINA before participating in wGT, as well as broader public education on GINA's legal protections and limitations. Genetic counselors lead GINA education efforts in clinical and public settings and can play a pivotal role in ongoing public education initiatives about GINA.
Keywords: GINA; attitudes; employment; genetic testing; knowledge.
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Genetic Counseling published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of National Society of Genetic Counselors.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors Willard, Uhlmann, Prince, Blasco, Pal, and Roberts each declare they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training.2024 Mar 29. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2024 Mar 29. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 36508513 Free Books & Documents.
-
Workplace Genomic Testing: What Do Company Websites Say about Federal Privacy and Anti-Discrimination Laws?Public Health Genomics. 2025;28(1):190-195. doi: 10.1159/000546189. Epub 2025 May 3. Public Health Genomics. 2025. PMID: 40319871
-
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec. Autism Adulthood. 2024. PMID: 40018061 Review.
-
A Pilot Study of Political Experiences and Barriers to Voting Among Autistic Adults Participating in Online Survey Research in the United States.Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):261-272. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0119. eCollection 2025 Jun. Autism Adulthood. 2025. PMID: 40539217
-
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29664187 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Multidisciplinary stakeholder-informed identification of key characteristics for implementation of workplace genetic testing.HGG Adv. 2025 Jul 10;6(3):100458. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2025.100458. Epub 2025 May 22. HGG Adv. 2025. PMID: 40411146 Free PMC article.
-
Workplace perk or pitfall? A qualitative study of genetic counselors' perspectives and experiences with workplace genetic testing.J Genet Couns. 2025 Jun;34(3):e70016. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70016. J Genet Couns. 2025. PMID: 40305363 Free PMC article.
-
Workplace genetic testing: which employees are likely to participate, what are their concerns with employer sponsorship, and which design features could reduce barriers and increase participation?Front Genet. 2024 Dec 4;15:1496900. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1496900. eCollection 2024. Front Genet. 2024. PMID: 39698465 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American Society of Human Genetics . (2017). ASHG opposes H.R.1313, the preserving employee wellness programs act [Press release]. https://www.ashg.org/publications‐news/press‐releases/201703‐hr1313/
-
- Lenartz, A. , Scherer, A. M. , Uhlmann, W. R. , Suter, S. M. , Anderson Hartley, C. , & Prince, A. E. R. (2021). The persistent lack of knowledge and misunderstanding of the genetic information nondiscrimination act (GINA) more than a decade after passage. Genetics in Medicine, 23(12), 2324–2334. 10.1038/s41436-021-01268-w - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical