A Partner-Engaged Approach to Developing an Implementation Research Logic Model for a Traumatic Brain Injury-Intensive Evaluation and Treatment Program
- PMID: 39038102
- DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000988
A Partner-Engaged Approach to Developing an Implementation Research Logic Model for a Traumatic Brain Injury-Intensive Evaluation and Treatment Program
Abstract
Background: A partnered evaluation project with Veterans Health Administration Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation program office uses a partner-engaged approach to characterize and evaluate the national implementation of traumatic brain injury (TBI)Intensive Evaluation and Treatment Program (IETP).
Objective: This paper illustrates a partner-engaged approach to contextualizing the IETP within an implementation research logic model (IRLM) to inform program sustainment and spread.
Setting: The project was conducted at five IETP sites: Tampa, Richmond, San Antonio, Palo Alto, and Minneapolis.
Participants: Partners included national and site program leaders, clinicians, Department of Defense Referral Representatives, and researchers. Participants included program staff ( n = 46) and Service Members/Veterans ( n = 48).
Design: This paper represents a component of a larger participatory-based concurrent mixed methods quality improvement project.
Main measures: Participant scripts and demographic surveys.
Methods: Datasets were analyzed using rapid iterative content analysis; IETP model was iteratively revised with partner feedback. Each site had an IETP clinical team member participate. The IRLM was contextualized within the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR); systematic consensus building expert reviewed implementation strategies; RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance); and Implementation Outcomes Framework (IOF).
Results: Analyses and partner feedback identified key characteristics, determinants, implementation strategies, mechanisms, and outcomes.
Conclusions: This partner-engaged IRLM informs implementation and sustainment of a rehabilitation program for individuals with TBI. Findings will be leveraged to examine implementation, standardize core outcome measurements, and inform knowledge translation.
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors declare there is no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Reid MW, Velez CS. Discriminating military and civilian traumatic brain injuries. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2015;66(Pt B):123–128. doi:10.1016/j.mcn.2015.03.014. - DOI
-
- Hammond FM, Corrigan JD, Ketchum JM, et al. Prevalence of medical and psychiatric comorbidities following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2019;34(4):E1–E10. doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000465. - DOI
-
- Malec JF. Polytrauma transitional rehabilitation in the veterans administration: implementing the principles of person-centered, participation-oriented rehabilitation. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2019;34(3):135–140. doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000456. - DOI
-
- Coming home (for real). VA News. Accessed January 18, 2024. https://news.va.gov/85533/coming-home-real/
-
- Florida VA program helps elite warriors heal unseen wounds of war - CBS News. CBS Mornings. Published 2020. Accessed January 18, 2024. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/florida-va-program-helps-elite-warriors-hea...
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
