Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 5;194(2):536-542.
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae232.

Systematic reviews of the literature: an introduction to current methods

Romina Brignardello-Petersen  1 , Nancy Santesso  1 , Gordon H Guyatt  1
Affiliations

Systematic reviews of the literature: an introduction to current methods

Romina Brignardello-Petersen et al. Am J Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Systematic reviews are a type of evidence synthesis in which authors develop explicit eligibility criteria, collect all the available studies that meet these criteria, and summarize results using reproducible methods that minimize biases and errors. Systematic reviews serve different purposes and use a different methodology than other types of evidence synthesis such as narrative reviews, scoping reviews, and overviews of reviews. Systematic reviews can address questions regarding effects of interventions or exposures, diagnostic properties of tests, and prevalence or prognosis of diseases. All rigorous systematic reviews have common processes that include (1) determining the question and eligibility criteria, including a priori specification of subgroup hypotheses, (2) searching for evidence and selecting studies, (3) abstracting data and assessing risk of bias of the included studies, (4) summarizing the data for each outcome of interest, whenever possible using meta-analyses, and (5) assessing the certainty of the evidence and drawing conclusions. There are several tools that can guide and facilitate the systematic review process, but methodological and content expertise are always necessary.

Keywords: evidence synthesis; systematic reviews.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors do not have any financial conflict of interest.

References

    1. Guyatt G, Rennie D, Meade M, et al. . Users’ Guides to the Medical Literature: a Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education, American Medical Association; 2015.
    1. Brignardello-Petersen R, Carrasco-Labra A, Guyatt GH. How to Interpret and Use a Clinical Practice Guideline or Recommendation: Users' Guides to the Medical Literature. JAMA. 2021;326(15):1516-1523. 10.1001/jama.2021.15319 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Takeuchi M, Showa S, Kitazawa K, et al. . Living alone is associated with an increased risk of institutionalization in older men: a follow‐up study in Hamanaka town of Hokkaido Japan. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2018;18(6):867-872. 10.1111/ggi.13267 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhao Y, Guyatt G, Gao Y, et al. . Living alone and all-cause mortality in community-dwelling adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine. 2022;54:101677. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101677 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gough D, Davies P, Jamtvedt G, et al. . Evidence synthesis international (ESI): position statement. Syst Rev. 2020;9(1):155. 10.1186/s13643-020-01415-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed