Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024;14(7):355-364.
doi: 10.1080/17581869.2024.2371779. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

Real-world evidence of durable multi-dimensional improvement after 60-day peripheral nerve stimulation treatment used for shoulder pain

Affiliations

Real-world evidence of durable multi-dimensional improvement after 60-day peripheral nerve stimulation treatment used for shoulder pain

Ali Valimahomed et al. Pain Manag. 2024.

Abstract

Aim: This real-world analysis aims to quantify improvements in multiple health domains in patients who received 60-day peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) for shoulder pain.Materials & methods: Patients reported percent pain relief and Patient Global Impression of Change in quality of life, physical function and sleep at the end of treatment (EOT), 3 months, and 6 months.Results: Of 768 patients, 80.7% were responders in at least one domain at EOT. In a subset who were followed up, a cumulative 75% continued to respond in at least one domain through 6 months (85% [n = 140/165] at 3 months and 88% [n = 53/60] at 6 months).Conclusion: 60-day PNS used for shoulder pain produced multi-dimensional improvements across health domains at EOT and through 6 months.

Keywords: chronic pain; neuromodulation; pain management; peripheral nerve stimulation; real world data; shoulder pain.

Plain language summary

Chronic shoulder pain is common. Patients often have challenges with quality of life, physical function and sleep. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is one available treatment for chronic shoulder pain. Studies like this one show how treatments work in everyday use. These studies are important to help patients and doctors make decisions about their treatment. This study looked at patients who received a 60-day PNS treatment for their shoulder pain. The treatment involved one or two small wires placed through the skin to stimulate nerves in the shoulder. At the end of treatment, they reported how much pain relief they had. They also reported how much their quality of life, physical function and sleep changed. Of 768 patients, most (80.7%) had improvement in at least one of these areas at the end of their PNS treatment. Only 5.9% of patients reported complications. The most common complaint was skin irritation. A smaller group of patients also shared how they were doing 3 months and 6 months after starting treatment. Overall, about 75% of patients continued to have improvement in at least one area 6 months after starting treatment. For many people, PNS provided improvements in pain and in other areas important to patients. These results suggest that 60-day PNS can be a valuable treatment for people with shoulder pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A Valimahomed has received consultancy and speaker fees from Nalu, consultancy fees from Vertos and consultancy fees, speaker fees and research funding from SPR Therapeutics. D Dickerson has received consultancy fees from Biotronik, Nalu, and Pfizer; consultancy and speaker fees from Vertos; consultancy fees and research funding from SPR Therapeutics; and speaker fees, consultancy fees, and research funding from Abbott. H Vucetic has received consultancy and speaker fees from Vertos, Boston Scientific, Saluda Medical, Intrinsic Therapeutics and SPR Therapeutics. J Rutledge has received consultancy fees from Boston Scientific and TerSera, and consultancy and speaker fees from Biotronik and SPR Therapeutics. CAZ is an employee of SPR Therapeutics and is a coinventor on patents related to the technology analyzed herein. ND Crosby and JW Boggs are employees of SPR Therapeutics, are coinventors on patents related to the technology analyzed herein, and hold stock options for SPR Therapeutics. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation System. (A) The 60-day peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) system (SPRINT PNS System; SPR Therapeutics) includes an external pulse generator worn on the body and controlled wirelessly by a patient remote. (B) The percutaneous lead component of the PNS system. Images used with permission of SPR Therapeutics.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
PNS Targets and Causes of Shoulder Pain. (A) The nerve targets of peripheral nerve stimulation treatment among the 768 included patients, including those who received one and two leads. (B) The distribution of causes of pain among the included patients. Some patients reported more than one cause of pain. Non-OA MSK: Non-osteoarthritic musculoskeletal pain.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Example Lead Placement Approaches. The local anatomy and example percutaneous lead trajectories for (A) the axillary nerve at the deltoid, (B) the axillary nerve at the quadrangular space and (C) the suprascapular nerve. Example ultrasound images for the lead approaches for the (D) axillary nerve at the quadrangular space and (E) the suprascapular nerve at the suprascapular notch.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
End of Treatment Outcomes. (A) The distribution of the number of domains of response for the overall population of 768 patients and separately for the most commonly reported causes of pain. Patients may have reported more than one cause of pain. (B) Responder rates across the four individual evaluated domains of health for the overall population (n = 768). Non-OA MSK: Non-osteoarthritic musculoskeletal pain.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Follow-up Outcomes. Cumulative proportion of patients in follow-up responding in at least one domain of health. The survival-type analysis demonstrates the proportion of end of treatment (EOT) responders with sustained relief at each successive follow-up time point.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cassou B, Derriennic F, Monfort C, et al. . Chronic neck and shoulder pain, age, and working conditions: longitudinal results from a large random sample in France. Occup. Environ. Med. 2002;59(8):537–544. doi:10.1136/oem.59.8.537 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Luime JJ, Koes BW, Hendriksen IJ, et al. . Prevalence and incidence of shoulder pain in the general population; a systematic review. Scand J Rheumatol. 2004;33(2):73–81. doi:10.1080/03009740310004667 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Croft P, Pope D, Silman A. The clinical course of shoulder pain: prospective cohort study in primary care. Primary Care Rheumatology Society Shoulder Study Group. BMJ. 1996;313(7057):601–602. doi:10.1136/bmj.313.7057.601 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van der Windt DA, Koes BW, Boeke AJ, et al. . Shoulder disorders in general practice: prognostic indicators of outcome. Br J Gen Pract. 1996;46(410):519–523. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bjørnholdt KT, Brandsborg B, Søballe K, et al. . Persistent pain is common 1–2 years after shoulder replacement: a nationwide registry-based questionnaire study of 538 patients. Acta orthopaedica. 2015;86(1):71–77. doi:10.3109/17453674.2014.987065 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources