Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Oct 15;79(4):901-909.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae380.

Preliminary Findings From the Dynamics of the Immune Responses to Repeat Influenza Vaccination Exposures (DRIVE I) Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Preliminary Findings From the Dynamics of the Immune Responses to Repeat Influenza Vaccination Exposures (DRIVE I) Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Benjamin J Cowling et al. Clin Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Studies have reported that repeated annual vaccination may influence influenza vaccination effectiveness in the current season.

Methods: We established a 5-year randomized placebo-controlled trial of repeated influenza vaccination (Flublok; Sanofi Pasteur) in adults 18-45 years of age. In the first 2 years, participants were randomized to receive vaccine or saline placebo as follows: placebo-placebo (P-P), placebo-vaccine (P-V), or vaccine-vaccine (V-V). Serum samples were collected each year just before vaccination and after 30 and 182 days. A subset of serum samples collected at 5 time points from 95 participants were tested for antibodies against vaccine strains.

Results: From 23 October 2020 through 11 March 2021 we enrolled and randomized 447 adults. Among vaccinated individuals, antibody titers increased between days 0 and 30 against each of the vaccine strains, with smaller increases for repeat vaccinees who on average had higher prevaccination titers in year 2. There were statistically significant differences in the proportions of participants achieving ≥4-fold rises in antibody titer for the repeat vaccinees for influenza A(H1N1), B/Victoria, and B/Yamagata, but not for A(H3N2). Among participants who received vaccination in year 2, there were no significant differences between the P-V and V-V groups in geometric mean titers at day 30 or the proportions of participants with antibody titers ≥40 at day 30 for any of the vaccine strains.

Conclusions: In the first 2 years, during which influenza did not circulate, repeat and first-time vaccinees had similar postvaccination geometric mean titers to all 4 vaccine strains, indicative of similar levels of clinical protection. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT04576377.

Keywords: ELISA; antibody; immunogenicity; influenza; vaccination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential conflicts of interest . B. J. C. consults for AstraZeneca, Fosun Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Haleon, Moderna, Novavax, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi Pasteur. S. E. H. is a coinventor on patents that describe the use of nucleoside-modified messenger RNA as a vaccine platform; S. E. H. also reports receiving consulting fees from Sanofi, Pfizer, Lumen, Novavax, and Merck. S. C. has consulted for Seqirus. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study flow chart showing participant enrollment into the study; randomization into placebo-placebo (P-P), placebo-vaccine (P-V), and vaccine-vaccine (V-V) groups; interventions received; and follow-up. The random samples were selected from participants who provided serum samples at these 5 time points: year 1, days 0, 30, and 182, and year 2, days 0 and 30.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Antibody titers at various time points measured by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assay for influenza A(H1N1) and B, and by focus reduction neutralization test (FRNT90) for influenza A(H3N2). Measured titers are plotted for each group 0, 30, and 182 days after vaccination in year 1 and 0 and 30 days after vaccination in year 2, and lines represent geometric mean titers at each time point.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Antibody titers at various time points measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for influenza A(H1N1) and A(H3N2). Measured titers are plotted at 0 and 30 days after vaccination in years 1 and 2, and lines represent geometric mean antibody titers at each time point.

Update of

References

    1. McLean HQ, Thompson MG, Sundaram ME, et al. Impact of repeated vaccination on vaccine effectiveness against influenza A(H3N2) and B during 8 seasons. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 59:1375–85. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Skowronski DM, Chambers C, Sabaiduc S, et al. A perfect storm: impact of genomic variation and serial vaccination on low influenza vaccine effectiveness during the 2014–2015 season. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 63:21–32. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Belongia EA, Skowronski DM, McLean HQ, Chambers C, Sundaram ME, De Serres G. Repeated annual influenza vaccination and vaccine effectiveness: review of evidence. Expert Rev Vaccines 2017; 16:723–36. - PubMed
    1. Ramsay LC, Buchan SA, Stirling RG, et al. The impact of repeated vaccination on influenza vaccine effectiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med 2019; 17:9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jones-Gray E, Robinson EJ, Kucharski AJ, Fox A, Sullivan SG. Does repeated influenza vaccination attenuate effectiveness? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med 2023; 11:27–44. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data