Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Jan 1;142(1):72-97.
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005170.

High Positive End-expiratory Pressure (PEEP) with Recruitment Maneuvers versus Low PEEP during General Anesthesia for Surgery: A Bayesian Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Three Randomized Clinical Trials

Collaborators, Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

High Positive End-expiratory Pressure (PEEP) with Recruitment Maneuvers versus Low PEEP during General Anesthesia for Surgery: A Bayesian Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Three Randomized Clinical Trials

Guido Mazzinari et al. Anesthesiology. .

Abstract

Background: The influence of high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with recruitment maneuvers on the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications after surgery is still not definitively established. Bayesian analysis can help to gain further insights from the available data and provide a probabilistic framework that is easier to interpret. The objective was to estimate the posterior probability that the use of high PEEP with recruitment maneuvers is associated with reduced postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with intermediate-to-high risk under neutral, pessimistic, and optimistic expectations regarding the treatment effect.

Methods: Multilevel Bayesian logistic regression analysis was performed on individual patient data from three randomized clinical trials carried out on surgical patients at intermediate to high risk for postoperative pulmonary complications. The main outcome was the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications in the early postoperative period. This study examined the effect of high PEEP with recruitment maneuvers versus low PEEP ventilation. Priors were chosen to reflect neutral, pessimistic, and optimistic expectations of the treatment effect.

Results: Using a neutral, pessimistic, or optimistic prior, the posterior mean odds ratio for high PEEP with recruitment maneuvers compared to low PEEP was 0.85 (95% credible interval, 0.71 to 1.02), 0.87 (0.72 to 1.04), and 0.86 (0.71 to 1.02), respectively. Regardless of prior beliefs, the posterior probability of experiencing a beneficial effect exceeded 90%. Subgroup analysis indicated a more pronounced effect in patients who underwent laparoscopy (odds ratio, 0.67 [0.50 to 0.87]) and those at high risk for postoperative pulmonary complications (odds ratio, 0.80 [0.53 to 1.13]). Sensitivity analysis, considering severe postoperative pulmonary complications only or applying a different heterogeneity prior, yielded consistent results.

Conclusions: High PEEP with recruitment maneuvers demonstrated a moderate reduction in the probability of postoperative pulmonary complication occurrence, with a high posterior probability of benefit observed consistently across various prior beliefs, particularly among patients who underwent laparoscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Schultz MJ, Hemmes SNT, Neto AS, et al.: Epidemiology, practice of ventilation and outcome for patients at increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications: LAS VEGAS–An observational study in 29 countries. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2017; 34:492–507
    1. Futier E, Constantin JM, Paugam-Burtz C, et al.; IMPROVE Study Group: A trial of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation in abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med 2013; 369:428–37
    1. Lagier D, Zeng C, Fernandez-Bustamante A, Vidal Melo MF: Perioperative pulmonary atelectasis: Part II. Clinical implications. A nesthesiology 2022; 136:206–36
    1. Campos NS, Bluth T, Hemmes SNT, et al.; REPEAT: Intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure and postoperative pulmonary complications: A patient-level meta-analysis of three randomised clinical trials. Br J Anaesth 2022; 128:1040–51
    1. Wasserstein RL, Lazar N: The ASA’s statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. Am Stat 2016; 70:129–33