Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 23;111(3):506-514.
doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.24-0075. Print 2024 Sep 4.

Parasitic Contamination of Soil in the Southern United States

Affiliations

Parasitic Contamination of Soil in the Southern United States

Christine Crudo Blackburn et al. Am J Trop Med Hyg. .

Abstract

Parasites are generally associated with lower income countries in tropical and subtropical areas. Still, they are also prevalent in low-income communities in the southern United States. Studies characterizing the epidemiology of parasites in the United States are limited, resulting in little comprehensive understanding of the problem. This study investigated the environmental contamination of parasites in the southern United States by determining each parasite's contamination rate and burden in five low-income communities. A total of 499 soil samples of approximately 50 g were collected from public parks and private residences in Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas. A technique using parasite floatation, filtration, and bead-beating was applied to dirt samples to concentrate and extract parasite DNA from samples and detected via multiparallel quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). qPCR detected total sample contamination of Blastocystis spp. (19.03%), Toxocara cati (6.01%), Toxocara canis (3.61%), Strongyloides stercoralis (2.00%), Trichuris trichiura (1.80%), Ancylostoma duodenale (1.42%), Giardia intestinalis (1.40%), Cryptosporidium spp. (1.01%), Entamoeba histolytica (0.20%), and Necator americanus (0.20%). The remaining samples had no parasitic contamination. Overall parasite contamination rates varied significantly between communities: western Mississippi (46.88%), southwestern Alabama (39.62%), northeastern Louisiana (27.93%), southwestern South Carolina (27.93%), and south Texas (6.93%) (P <0.0001). T. cati DNA burdens were more significant in communities with higher poverty rates, including northeastern Louisiana (50.57%) and western Mississippi (49.60%) compared with southwestern Alabama (30.05%) and southwestern South Carolina (25.01%) (P = 0.0011). This study demonstrates the environmental contamination of parasites and their relationship with high poverty rates in communities in the southern United States.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors’ contributions: C. C. Blackburn and R. Mejia conceptualized and designed the study. C. C. Blackburn, S. M. Yan, D. McCormick, and R. Mejia designed the methods. C. C. Blackburn, S. M. Yan, D. McCormick, L. N. Herrera, R. B. Iordanov, M. D. Baiely, and R. Mejia processed the samples. C. C. Blackburn, S. M. Yan, and R. Mejia conducted the formal data analysis. C. C. Blackburn, S. M. Yan, and R. Mejia verified the complete data. S. M. Yan and R. Mejia drafted figures with input from other authors. C. C. Blackburn, M. E. Bottazzi, P. J. Hotez, and R. Mejia provided oversight and leadership for the study. All authors approved the manuscript. All authors had full access to all the data in the study and were ultimately responsible for deciding to submit it for publication.

Disclosures: R. Mejia received a research grant from Romark Laboratories. C. C. Blackburn received research funding from the Bush School of Government and Public Service and the Scowcroft Institute of International Affairs at Texas A&M University. P. J. Hotez and M. E. Botzzi are inventors and patentholders of vaccines against neglected tropical diseases, including vaccines against schistosomiasis and hookworm in clinical trials.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Map of communities and their respective poverty rates. Quintiles of poverty rates were retrieved from the 2019 American Community Survey and displayed around the time of soil sample collections.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Overall parasite contamination rate (%, blue bars) and poverty rates (%, black dots) by community. There was a significant difference in the contamination rate between the communities (P <0.0001). The contamination rate was calculated as number of positive samples/total number of samples tested × 100%. Samples for any parasite tested were considered positive for the overall parasite contamination rate. Community poverty rates were obtained from the 2019 American Community Survey by the U.S. Census Bureau.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Toxocara spp. contamination rate (%, blue bars) and poverty rates (%, black dots) by community. There was a significant difference in the contamination rate between the communities (P <0.0001). The contamination rate was calculated as number of positive samples/total number of samples tested × 100%. Samples positive for T. cati or T. canis were considered positive for the Toxocara spp. contamination rate. Community poverty rates were obtained from the 2019 American Community Survey by the U.S. Census Bureau.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Normalized Toxocara cati burdens (fg/µL of DNA per kg of soil) by the community. T. cati burdens were significantly greater for communities with higher poverty rates (P = 0.0011). Community poverty rates were obtained from the 2019 American Community Survey by the U.S. Census Bureau.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hotez PJ, 2008. Neglected infections of poverty in the United States of America. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2: e256. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kucik CJ, Martin GL, Sortor BV, 2004. Common intestinal parasites. Am Fam Physician 69: 1161–1168. - PubMed
    1. Nokes C, Grantham-McGregor SM, Sawyer AW, Cooper ES, Bundy DA, 1992. Parasitic helminth infection and cognitive function in school children. Proc Biol Sci 247: 77–81. - PubMed
    1. Doni NY, Zeyrek FY, Simsek Z, Gurses G, Sahin I, 2015. Risk factors and relationships between intestinal parasites and the growth retardation and psychomotor development delays in children in Sanliurfa, Turkey. RTurkiye Parazit Derg 39: 270–276. - PubMed
    1. Won KY, Kruszon-Moran D, Schantz PM, Jones JL, 2008. National seroprevalence and risk factors for Zoonotic Toxocara spp. infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg 79: 552–557. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources