A qualitative exploration of the reasons and influencing factors for pregnancy termination among young women in Soweto, South Africa: a Socio-ecological perspective
- PMID: 39044292
- PMCID: PMC11265480
- DOI: 10.1186/s12978-024-01852-8
A qualitative exploration of the reasons and influencing factors for pregnancy termination among young women in Soweto, South Africa: a Socio-ecological perspective
Abstract
Background: Pregnancy termination is an essential component of reproductive healthcare. In Southern Africa, an estimated 23% of all pregnancies end in termination of pregnancy, against a backdrop of high rates of unintended pregnancies and unsafe pregnancy terminations, which contributes to maternal morbidity and mortality. Understanding the reasons for pregnancy termination may remain incomplete if seen in isolation of interpersonal (including family, peer, and partner), community, institutional, and public policy factors. This study therefore aimed to use a socio-ecological framework to qualitatively explore, in Soweto, South Africa, i) reasons for pregnancy termination amongst women aged 18-28 years, and ii) factors characterising the decision to terminate.
Methods: In-depth interviews were conducted between February to March 2022 with ten participants of varying parity, who underwent a termination of pregnancy since being enrolled in the Bukhali trial, set in Soweto, South Africa. A semi-structured, in-depth interview guide, based on the socioecological domains, was used. The data was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, and a deductive approach.
Results: An application of the socio-ecological framework indicated that the direct reasons to terminate a pregnancy fell into the individual and interpersonal domains of the socioecological framework. Key reasons included financial dependence and insecurity, feeling unready to have a child (again), and a lack of support from family and partners for the participant and their pregnancy. In addition to these reasons, Factors that characterised the participants' decision experience were identified across all socio-ecological domains and included the availability of social support and (lack of) accessibility to termination services. The COVID-19 pandemic and resultant lockdown policies also indirectly impacted participants' decisions through detrimental changes in interpersonal support and financial situation.
Conclusions: Amongst the South African women included in this study, the decision to terminate a pregnancy was made within a complex structural and social context. Insight into the reasons why women choose to terminate helps to better align legal termination services with women's needs across multiple sectors, for example by reducing judgement within healthcare settings and improving access to social and mental health support.
Keywords: Reproductive health; Socio-ecological model; Termination of pregnancy; Women of reproductive age.
Plain language summary
In South Africa, where the number of unintended pregnancies is high, we need an improved understanding of the main reasons why women terminate their pregnancies and what factors characterise this decision. Aside from individual factors, this should also be seen within the context of their environment, including relationships, community, and institutions. We therefore aimed to explore women’s reasons for choosing to terminate their pregnancy through semi-structured in-depth interviews with participants. We included ten participants from Soweto, South Africa, who had undergone a pregnancy termination. The main reasons for terminating a pregnancy had to do with personal factors and reasons related to their social relationships and support. These included financial insecurity, not feeling ready to have a child (again), and lack of support from family or partners. We also found factors that characterised how the participant experienced the decision, such as barriers to getting a safe (legal) pregnancy termination. We found that amongst South African women, the decision to terminate is made in the context of their complex (social) environment. Insight into the reasons why women choose to terminate helps to better align legal termination services with women’s needs, for example by reducing judgement within healthcare settings and improving access to social and mental health support.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The role of a community health worker-delivered preconception and pregnancy intervention in achieving a more positive pregnancy experience: the Bukhali trial in Soweto, South Africa.BMC Womens Health. 2024 Mar 5;24(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-02982-8. BMC Womens Health. 2024. PMID: 38443924 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Understanding abortion seeking care outside of formal health care settings in Cape Town, South Africa: a qualitative study.Reprod Health. 2021 Sep 23;18(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01243-3. Reprod Health. 2021. PMID: 34556120 Free PMC article.
-
What has women's reproductive health decision-making capacity and other factors got to do with pregnancy termination in sub-Saharan Africa? evidence from 27 cross-sectional surveys.PLoS One. 2020 Jul 23;15(7):e0235329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235329. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32702035 Free PMC article.
-
A scoping review of qualitative studies on sexual and reproductive health and rights in Uganda: Exploring factors at multiple levels.Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241285193. doi: 10.1177/17455057241285193. Womens Health (Lond). 2024. PMID: 39345026 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Influencing Abortion Decision-Making of Adolescents and Young Women: A Narrative Scoping Review.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Mar 1;21(3):288. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21030288. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38541288 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Navigating relationship dynamics, pregnancy and fatherhood in the Bukhali trial: a qualitative study with men in Soweto, South Africa.BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 8;23(1):2204. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17153-x. BMC Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37940937 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Epidemiological trends in abortion and miscarriage between 1990 and 2019.Reprod Health. 2025 Jun 5;22(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-02049-3. Reprod Health. 2025. PMID: 40474281 Free PMC article.
-
Retention in the Bukhali trial in Soweto, South Africa: a qualitative analysis using self-determination theory.BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Feb 10;10(2):e017729. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017729. BMJ Glob Health. 2025. PMID: 39929537 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
"You go an extra mile": a qualitative study of community health worker perspectives in a health promotion intervention in urban South Africa.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 23;24(1):1641. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12127-0. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 39716204 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Guttmacher Institute. Guttmacher Institute Data Center: Southern Africa. 2023.
-
- Grimes DA, Benson J, Singh S, Romero M, Ganatra B, Okonofua FE, et al. Unsafe abortion: the preventable pandemic. Lancet. 2006;368(9550):1908–19. Available from: http://www.thelancet.com/article/S0140673606694816/fulltext. Cited 2022 Mar 14. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69481-6 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ganatra B, Gerdts C, Rossier C, Johnson BR, Tunçalp Ö, Assifi A, et al. Global, regional, and subregional classification of abortions by safety, 2010–14: estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model. Lancet. 2017;390(10110):2372–81 Available from: http://www.thelancet.com/article/S0140673617317944/fulltext. Cited 2022 Mar 14. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31794-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization (WHO). World health statistics 2020: monitoring health for the SDGs. Geneva; 2020.
-
- Bain LE, Zweekhorst MBM, de Cock Buning T. Prevalence and determinants of unintended pregnancy in sub –saharan africa: A systematic review. Afr J Reprod Health. 2020;24(2):187–205. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical