Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul;38(7):e15408.
doi: 10.1111/ctr.15408.

A Digital Approach to Improve Infection Screening Among Solid Organ Transplant Candidates

Elda Righi  1   2 , Alessandro Visentin  1 , Massimo Mirandola  1   2 , Costanza Rigo  1 , Carmine Cutone  1 , Matilde Rocchi  1 , Lucia Bonato  1 , Maddalena Armellini  1 , Chiara Caletti  3 , Francesco Onorati  4 , Livio San Biagio  4 , Giovanni Battista Luciani  4 , Gina Mazzeo  4 , Mara Merighi  2 , Gianluca Vantini  5 , Alex Borin  6 , Luigino Boschiero  7 , Amedeo Carraro  6 , Evelina Tacconelli  1   2
Affiliations

A Digital Approach to Improve Infection Screening Among Solid Organ Transplant Candidates

Elda Righi et al. Clin Transplant. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Pretransplant infection screening (IS) of potential organ recipients is essential to optimal outcome of solid organ transplantation (SOT).

Methods: A pre-post study was performed during 2020-2023 to investigate the impact of the STREAM (Solid organ TRansplant stEwArdship and Multidisciplinary approach) intervention to improve IS in SOT. The intervention, performed in 2022, included the implementation of IS through educational meetings, local guidelines, and the availability of a digital screening tool. The objective of the study was the assessment of IS completion, including a list of 17 laboratory tests and the investigation of vaccination status. The reduction of unnecessary tests was also analyzed. The test of proportions and a multilevel multivariate Poisson regression model were used to compare IS completion before and after STREAM. infectious diseases (ID) consultation and urgent evaluation were investigated as predictors of IS completion.

Results: A total of 171 patients were enrolled, including liver (44%), heart (32%), and kidney (24%) transplant candidates. Mean age was 56 ± 11 years, and most patients (77%) were males. Ninety-five (56%) patients were included before the intervention and 76 (44%) after STREAM. IS completion increased after STREAM (IRR 1.41, p < 0.001) with significant improvement recorded for seven (39%) IS items. Unnecessary tests decreased by 43% after the intervention. ID consultation (IRR 1.13, p = 0.02) and urgent evaluation (p = 0.68, p < 0.001) were predictors of IS improvement.

Conclusions: STREAM was successful in improving IS completion. Further research is needed to investigate the impact of this intervention on posttransplant infections.

Keywords: digital platform; infection screening; solid organ transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J. A. Fishman, “Infection in Organ Transplantation,” American Journal of Transplantation 17, no. 4 (2017): 856–879.
    1. C. van Delden, S. Stampf, H. H. Hirsch, et al., “Burden and Timeline of Infectious Diseases in the First Year After Solid Organ Transplantation in the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study,” Clinical Infectious Diseases 71, no. 7 (2020): e159–e169.
    1. R. K. Avery, “Recipient Screening Prior to Solid‐organ Transplantation,” Clinical Infectious Diseases 35, no. 12 (2002): 1513–1519.
    1. R. T. Sutton, D. Pincock, D. C. Baumgart, D. C. Sadowski, R. Fedorak, and K. I. Kroeker, “An Overview of Clinical Decision Support Systems: Benefits, Risks, and Strategies for Success.” npj Digital Med 3 (2020): 17.
    1. S. J. Shnall Iribarren, “Review and Analysis of Existing Mobile Phone Applications for Health Care‐associated Infection Prevention,” American Journal of Infection Control 43, no. 6 (2015): 572–576.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources