A Randomized, Controlled Trial Evaluating Perioperative Risk-stratification and Risk-based, Protocol-driven Management After Elective Major Cancer Surgery
- PMID: 39045699
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006446
A Randomized, Controlled Trial Evaluating Perioperative Risk-stratification and Risk-based, Protocol-driven Management After Elective Major Cancer Surgery
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of risk-based, protocol-driven management versus usual management after elective major cancer surgery to reduce 30-day rates of postoperative death or serious complications (DSCs).
Background: Major cancer surgery is associated with significant perioperative risks, which result in worse long-term outcomes.
Methods: Adults scheduled for elective major cancer surgery were stratified/randomized to risk-based escalating levels of care, monitoring, and comanagement versus usual management. The primary study outcome was a 30-day rate of DSC. Additional outcomes included complications, adverse events, health care utilization, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and disease-free survival and overall survival.
Results: Between August 2014 and June 2020, 1529 patients were enrolled and randomly allocated to the study arms; 738 patients in the intervention arm and 732 patients in the control arm were eligible for analysis. Thirty-day rate of DSC with the intervention was 15.0% (95% CI: 12.5%-17.6%) versus 14.1%, (95% CI: 11.6%-16.6%) with usual management ( P = 0.65). There were no differences in 30-day rates of complications or adverse events (including return to the operating room), postoperative length of stay, rate of discharge to home, or 30, 60, or 90-day HRQOL or rates of hospital readmission or receipt of antineoplastic therapy between the study arms. At a median follow-up of 48 months, overall survival ( P = 0.57) and disease-free survival ( P = 0.91) were similar.
Conclusions: Risk-based, protocol-driven management did not reduce the 30-day rate of DSC after elective major cancer surgery compared with usual management, nor did it improve postoperative health care utilization, HRQOL, or cancer outcomes. Trials are needed to identify cost-effective, tailored perioperative strategies to optimize outcomes after major cancer surgery.
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Lucas DJ, Pawlik TM. Quality improvement in gastrointestinal surgical oncology with American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Surgery. 2014;155:593–601.
-
- Tevis SE, Kohlnhofer BM, Stringfield S, et al. Postoperative complications in patients with rectal cancer are associated with delays in chemotherapy that lead to worse disease-free and overall survival. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:1339–1348.
-
- Scaife CL, Hartz A, Pappas L, et al. Association between postoperative complications and clinical cancer outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:4063–4066.
-
- Waingankar N, Esnaola NF, Uzzo RF. A structured framework for optimizing surgical quality through process-of-care trials. Urol Oncol. 2017;35:177–179.
-
- Bilimoria K, Liu Y, Paruch J, et al. Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217:833–842.e1–3.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
