Ocrelizumab in people with primary progressive multiple sclerosis: A real-world multicentric study
- PMID: 39047339
- DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2024.105776
Ocrelizumab in people with primary progressive multiple sclerosis: A real-world multicentric study
Abstract
Background: Ocrelizumab is the only disease-modifying therapy (DMT) approved for the treatment of people with primary progressive multiple sclerosis (pwPPMS).
Objectives: To provide real-world evidence of ocrelizumab effectiveness and safety in pwPPMS in Croatian MS centers.
Methods: A retrospective observational multi-center study of pwPPMS who were started on ocrelizumab in 7 MS centers in Croatia.
Results: We identified 230 pwPPMS of whom 176 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up of the cohort was 2.73 (0.51-5.77) years. During the follow-up, 50 (28.4%) pwPPMS experienced confirmed disability worsening (CDW) and 19 (10.8%) stopped treatment with ocrelizumab. Baseline EDSS >5 was a statistically significant positive predictor for the development of CDW and/or stop of the treatment due to any cause (OR 2.482, 95% C.I. 1.192-5.166, p = 0.015). However, there was no significant difference in the development of CDW and/or stop of the treatment due to any cause if stratifying the patients based on active PPMS, age at treatment start (≤55 years vs >55 years), disease duration at treatment start (≤10 years vs >10 years), or EDSS at treatment start (≤5.0 vs >5.0). During the follow-up, 26 (14.8%) pwPPMS experienced infusion reactions, 64 (36.4%) had an infection and 4 (2.3%) developed a tumor. The percentage of pwPPMS with low levels of IgG was persistently above 10% and with low levels of IgM was persistently above 20% after cycle 4.
Conclusion: Our real-world data support the use of ocrelizumab in a much broader pwPPMS population than in the original randomized controlled trial.
Keywords: Ocrelizumab; Primary progressive multiple sclerosis; Real-world data.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest MH, IA, BB, TG, MKS: Participated as a clinical investigator and/or received consultation and/or speaker fees from: Biogen, Sanofi Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Pliva/Teva, Roche, Zentiva, Actelion, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, TG Pharmaceuticals. VBK: Participated as a clinical investigator and/or received consultation and/or speaker fees from: Biogen, Sanofi Genzyme, Merck, Pliva/Teva, Roche. NG: Nothing to disclose. IL: Participated as a clinical investigator and/or received consultation and/or speaker fees from: Novartis, Roche, Merck, Biogen, Sanofi, Pliva. SP: Participated as a clinical investigator and/or received consultation and/or speaker fees from: Novartis, Roche, Merck, Biogen, Zentiva, Pliva. TMZ: Participated as a clinical investigator and/or received consultation and/or speaker fees from: Roche, Biogen, Teva/Pliva, Merck, Sanofi, Novartis. MK: Participated as a clinical investigator and/or received consultation and/or speaker fees from: Novartis, Biogen, Merck, Sanofi. SKP: Participated as a clinical investigator and/or received consultation and/or speaker fees from: Roche, Biogen, Boerhringer, Teva/Pliva, Merck, Novartis. AA: Nothing to disclose. There was no support from any organization for the submitted work; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
