Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov;31(12):8362-8371.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15882-w. Epub 2024 Jul 24.

The Predictive Factors of Combined Implant Application for Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Immediate Breast Reconstruction with a Pedicled Omental Flap

Affiliations

The Predictive Factors of Combined Implant Application for Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Immediate Breast Reconstruction with a Pedicled Omental Flap

Junda Hu et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Whether a laparoscopically harvested omental flap is adequate for total breast reconstruction could not be determined preoperativaly due to lack of reliable assessment methods. This study aimed to establish a statistical model to predict the probability of omental flap insufficiency.

Methods: In this study, 200 female patients with breast cancer receiving immediate breast reconstruction with pure pedicled omental flaps or pedicled omental flaps combined with implants after nipple-areolar complex-sparing mastectomy were divided into two groups depending on whether implants were needed or not. The clinical characteristics of these two groups were compared. Correlation of body mass index (BMI) and omental volume was analyzed. Binary logistic regression was performed to predict the probability of implant requirement based on clinical parameters, showing significant differences between the two groups.

Results: The patients who needed implants in adjunct treatment were younger. In addition, they had larger breast specimens and smaller omental volumes than the others whose omental flaps were sufficient for total breast reconstruction. Body mass index and omental volume showed a moderately positive correlation. Age, specimen volume, and BMI all were entered into the logistic regression equation. For the patients with a BMI lower than 24.0 kg/m2, the probability of requiring implants was 5.467 times that of comparable patients with a BMI of 24.0 kg/m2 or higher. At the cutoff of 0.61, the regression equation yielded a sensitivity of 84.2% and a specificity of 72.1% in recognizing subjects with the necessity of implant application.

Conclusion: The combination of BMI, age, and volume of breast specimen could predict with high accuracy whether implants are required for breast cancer patients receiving pedicled omental flap-based breast reconstruction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Yoon AP, Qi J, Brown DL, et al. Outcomes of immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction: results of a multicenter prospective study. Breast. 2018;37:72–9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Elander A, Moellhoff N, Hansson E, et al. ESPRAS survey on breast reconstruction in Europe. Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plastische Chirurgie. 2021;53:340–8. - DOI
    1. Weichman KE, Broer PN, Thanik VD, et al. Patient-reported satisfaction and quality of life following breast reconstruction in thin patients: a comparison between microsurgical and prosthetic implant recipients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136:213–20. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clemens MW, Horwitz SM. NCCN consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Aesthet Surg J. 2017;37:285–9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kahter A, Ghazy H, Setit A, et al. Laparoscopically harvested omental flap for immediate total breast reconstruction; lessons learnt through ten-year experience in a tertiary oncology center. Surg Innov. 2023;30:184–92. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources