Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 25;20(1):43.
doi: 10.1186/s13223-024-00903-w.

The complexities of decision-making associated with on-demand treatment of hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks

Affiliations

The complexities of decision-making associated with on-demand treatment of hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks

Stephen D Betschel et al. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is characterized by debilitating attacks of tissue swelling in various locations. While guidelines recommend the importance of early on-demand treatment, recent data indicate that many patients delay or do not treat their attacks.

Objective: This survey aimed to investigate patient behavior and evaluate the key factors that drive on-demand treatment decision-making, as reported by those living with HAE.

Methods: People living with HAE were recruited by the US Hereditary Angioedema Association (HAEA) to complete a 20-minute online survey between September 6, and October 19, 2022.

Results: Respondents included 107 people with HAE, 80% female, 98% adults (≥ 18 years). Attack management included on-demand therapy only (50%, n = 53) or prophylaxis with on-demand therapy (50%, n = 54). Most patients (63.6%) reported that they did not carry on-demand treatment at all times when away from home. The most common reason for not carrying on-demand treatment when away from home was 'prefer to treat at home' (72.1%). Overall, 86% of respondents reported delaying on-demand treatment, despite recognizing the initial onset of an HAE attack and despite 97% of patients agreeing that it is important to recover quickly from an HAE attack. Reasons for non-treatment or treatment delay included 'the attack is not severe enough to treat' (91.9% and 88.0%, respectively), 'cost of treatment' (31.1% and 40.2%, respectively), anxiety about refilling the prescription for on-demand treatment quickly (31.1% and 37.0%, respectively), the pain (injection or burning) associated with their on-demand treatment (18.9% and 28.3%, respectively), the lack of a suitable/private area to administer on-demand treatment (17.6% and 27.2%, respectively), lack of time to prepare on-demand treatment (16.2% and 16.3%, respectively), and a 'fear of needles' (13% and 12.2%, respectively). Survey findings from the patient perspective revealed that when on-demand treatment was delayed, 75% experienced HAE attacks that progressed in severity, and 80% reported longer attack recovery.

Conclusions: Survey results highlight that decision-making regarding on-demand treatment in HAE is more complicated than expected. The burden associated with current parenteral on-demand therapies is often the cause of treatment delay, despite acknowledgment that delays may result in progression of HAE attacks and longer time to recovery.

Keywords: Attacks; Decision-making, Burden of treatment, Survey, HAE attack journey; Hereditary angioedema (HAE); On-demand treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Duration of delay in administration of on-demand treatment after initial recognition of HAE attack onset
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A Reasons provided for not treating an HAE attack (n = 74, excluding those who treat all of their attacks, n = 33) – respondents could select as many as they liked B Reasons provided for waiting to treat an HAE attack at recognition of attack onset (n = 92, excluding those that immediately treat their HAE attacks, n = 15) – respondents could select as many as they liked

References

    1. Sinnathamby ES, Issa PP, Roberts L, Norwood H, Malone K, Vemulapalli H, et al. Hereditary Angioedema: diagnosis, clinical implications, and pathophysiology. Adv Ther. 2023;40(3):814–27. 10.1007/s12325-022-02401-0. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Busse PJ, Christiansen SC, Riedl MA, Banerjo A, Bernstein JA, Castaldo AJ, et al. US HAEA medical advisory board 2020 guidelines for the management of hereditary angioedema. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021;9(1):132–e503. 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.08.046. - PubMed
    1. Cicardi M, Agostoni A. Hereditary Angioedema. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(25):1666–7. 10.1056/NEJM199606203342510. - PubMed
    1. Riedl MA, Danese M, Danese S, Ulloa J, Maetzel A, Audhya PK. Hereditary Angioedema with normal C1 inhibitor: US survey of prevalence and provider practice patterns. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023;11(8):2450–e66. 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.01.023. - PubMed
    1. Dreskin S. Urticaria and Angioedema. In: Goldman L, Schafer AI, editors. Cecil Medicine. 24th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2011. Chapter 260.

LinkOut - more resources