Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 24;24(1):838.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11284-6.

A self-assessment maturity matrix to support large-scale change using collaborative networks in the New Zealand health system

Kanchan M Sharma  1 , Peter B Jones  2 , Jacqueline Cumming  3 , Lesley Middleton  4
Affiliations

A self-assessment maturity matrix to support large-scale change using collaborative networks in the New Zealand health system

Kanchan M Sharma et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: A maturity matrix can be a useful tool for organisations implementing large-system transformation (LST) initiatives in complex systems. Insights from implementation of a local LST initiative using collaborative networks, known as Alliances, highlighted a tool was needed to help health system leaders prompt discussions on how and where to focus their change efforts. In the New Zealand (NZ) health system, Alliances were introduced to integrate the planning and delivery of health care between primary and hospital care.

Methods: The aim of this research was to use insights from Alliance members to develop a learning tool that collaborative networks could use to assess and improve their readiness for change. We constructed a maturity matrix using the knowledge of senior NZ health system leaders, in a workshop setting. The maturity matrix was empirically tested and refined with three Alliances and with feedback from the NZ Ministry of Health Māori Health Strategy and Policy team.

Results: The maturity matrix described the 10 key elements that had been found to support successful implementation of LST initiatives in the NZ health system, along with success indicators and different stages of maturity from beginning to excellence. Testing of the maturity matrix with three Alliances suggested that it functioned as a learning tool and stimulated collective thinking and reflection. The Māori Health Strategy and Policy team commented on the importance of such a tool to increase health system leaders' responsiveness to improving Māori health outcomes. Comparisons with similar international matrices revealed common elements with ours. A strength of our maturity matrix is that it is specific to the NZ context and is the first practical tool to implement large-scale change in the health system that incorporates principles of the Government's treaty with Māori, the indigenous people of NZ.

Conclusions: Through a regular self-assessment process, use of the maturity matrix may create feedback loops to support deliberate learning and knowledge sharing for senior health system leaders and collaborative networks. The maturity matrix fills an important gap in the NZ health system and contributes to implementation science literature internationally.

Other: This study was approved by the Victoria University of Wellington Human Ethics Committee (Ethics Approval Number 27,356). The research was supported by the Victoria University of Wellington research grant (222,809) and from the University of Auckland Department of Medicine research fund (H10779).

Keywords: Collaborative networks; Continuous improvement; Health care reform; Integrated care; Large-scale change; Maturity matrix.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

KMS and PBJ were employed by the NZ Ministry of Health and led the design and implementation of the System Level Measures programme referenced in the research. JC and LM do not have any competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Iterative process for developing and refining the maturity matrix
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Edwards A, Rhydderch M, Engels Y, Campbell S, Vodopivec-Jamsek V, Marshall M, et al. Assessing organisational development in European primary care using a group-based method: a feasibility study of the Maturity Matrix. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2010;23(1):8–21. 10.1108/09526861011010640 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Elwyn G, Rhydderch M, Edwards A, Hutchings H, Marshall M, Myres P, Grol R. Assessing organisational development in primary medical care using a group based assessment: the Maturity Matrix. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(4):287–94. 10.1136/qshc.2003.008540 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elwyn G, Bekkers M, Tapp L, Edwards A, Newcombe R, Eriksson T, et al. Facilitating organisational development using a group-based formative assessment and benchmarking method: design and implementation of the International Family Practice Maturity Matrix. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(6):e48. - PubMed
    1. Buch M, Edwards A, Eriksson T. Participants’ evaluation of a group-based organisational assessment tool in Danish general practice: the Maturity Matrix. Qual Prim Care. 2009;17(5):311–22. - PubMed
    1. Barnes E, Howells EP, Marshall K, Bullock A, Cowpe J, Thomas H. Development of the Maturity Matrix Dentistry (MMD): a primary care dental team development tool. Br Dent J. 2012;212(12):583–7. 10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.523 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources