Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug;11(8):1964-1976.
doi: 10.1002/acn3.52097. Epub 2024 Jul 24.

Clinical utility of diffusion MRI-derived measures of cortical microstructure in a real-world memory clinic setting

Affiliations

Clinical utility of diffusion MRI-derived measures of cortical microstructure in a real-world memory clinic setting

Mario Torso et al. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate cortical microstructural measures from diffusion MRI as "neurodegeneration" markers that could improve prognostic accuracy in mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

Methods: The prognostic power of Amyloid/Tau/Neurodegeneration (ATN) biomarkers to predict progression from MCI to AD or non-AD dementia was investigated. Ninety patients underwent clinical evaluation (follow-up interval 32 ± 18 months), lumbar puncture, and MRI. Participants were grouped by clinical stage and cerebrospinal fluid Amyloid and Tau status. T1-structural and diffusion MRI scans were analyzed to calculate diffusion metrics related to cortical columnar structure (AngleR, ParlPD, PerpPD+), cortical mean diffusivity, and fractional anisotropy. Statistical tests were corrected for multiple comparisons. Prognostic power was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and related indices.

Results: A progressive increase of whole-brain cortical diffusion values was observed along the AD continuum, with all A+ groups showing significantly higher AngleR than A-T-. Investigating clinical progression to dementia, the AT biomarkers together showed good positive predictive value (with 90.91% of MCI A+T+ converting to dementia) but poor negative predictive value (with 40% of MCI A-T- progressing to a mix of AD and non-AD dementias). Adding whole-brain AngleR as an N marker, produced good differentiation between stable and converting MCI A-T- patients (0.8 area under ROC curve) and substantially improved negative predictive value (+21.25%).

Interpretation: Results support the clinical utility of cortical microstructure to aid prognosis, especially in A-T- patients. Further work will investigate other complexities of the real-world clinical setting, including A-T+ groups. Diffusion MRI measures of neurodegeneration may complement fluid AT markers to support clinical decision-making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

S.A. Chance is a co‐founder of a company, Oxford Brain Diagnostics, from which he has received funding for the research and preparation of this manuscript; M. Torso, G.R. Ridgway, and I. Hardingham are currently employed at a company, Oxford Brain Diagnostics; S.A. Chance has a patent (WO2016162682A1) related to the diffusion MRI analysis used in the present study; G. Fumagalli, V.E. Contarino, E. Scarpini, D. Galimberti, and A. Arighi report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cortical microstructural metrics. This figure shows a cross‐sectional image of diffusion based metrics related to the three directional components of diffusion within the cortical gray matter.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Micro‐ and macrostructural group differences. This figure shows micro‐ and macrostructural values across the AT continuum that includes MCI and Dementia groups. CVF, cortical volume fraction; CT, cortical thickness; HVF, hippocampal volume fraction.
Figure 3
Figure 3
CSF markers: Amyloid (A) and Tau (T) flow diagram. Flow diagram shows performance testing structure of the CSF AT biomarkers. The test was conducted in the MCI A−T− and A+T+ groups, by comparing against the clinical status (MCI clinical status: Converted or Stable). The expected profile for MCI Converted is A+T+, and the expected profile for MCI Stable is A−T−. As seen in the figure, mixed AT profiles (A−T+, or A+T−) were excluded, in order to reduce the potential for including inaccurately classified cases.
Figure 4
Figure 4
AngleR flow diagram in MCI A−T−. Flow diagram shows the performance testing structure of AngleR conducted in the MCI A−T− group, for comparison against the clinical profile (MCI clinical status: Converted or Stable). AngleR status, positive (+) or negative (−), was determined by the cutoff defined as the best point with the highest value obtained by averaging sensitivity and 1 − specificity.
Figure 5
Figure 5
AngleR diagnostic power in MCI A−T− and MCI A+T+ stable vs converted. Panel (A) shows separation between stable and converted MCI A−T− using whole‐brain AngleR value. Panel (B) shows separation between stable and converted MCI A−T− and A+T+ using whole‐brain AngleR value. AD, Alzheimer's disease; CBS, corticobasal syndrome; DLB, Dementia with Lewy body; PCA, posterior cortical atrophy; PSP, progressive supranuclear palsy.

References

    1. Holtzman DM, Morris JC, Goate AM. Alzheimer's disease: the challenge of the second century. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3(77):77sr1. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.30023 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Maurik IS, Zwan MD, Tijms B, et al. Interpreting biomarker results in individual MCI patients—the ABIDE project. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74(12):1481‐1491. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.2712 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simrén J, Leuzy A, Karikari TK, et al. The diagnostic and prognostic capabilities of plasma biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2021;17(7):1145‐1156. doi:10.1002/alz.12283 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benedet AL, Brum WS, Hansson O, et al. The accuracy and robustness of plasma biomarker models for amyloid PET positivity. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2022;14(1):1‐11. doi:10.1186/s13195-021-00942-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jack CR Jr, Bennett DA, Blennow K, et al. NIA‐AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14(4):535‐562. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms