Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jan-Dec:18:17539447241263444.
doi: 10.1177/17539447241263444.

Coronary intravascular lithotripsy in contemporary practice: challenges and opportunities in coronary intervention

Affiliations
Review

Coronary intravascular lithotripsy in contemporary practice: challenges and opportunities in coronary intervention

Ankush Gupta et al. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2024 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of calcified coronary arteries is associated with poor outcomes. Poorly modified calcified lesion hinders the stent delivery, disrupts drug-carrying polymer, impairs drug elution kinetics and results in under-expanded stent (UES). UES is the most common cause of acute stent thrombosis and in-stent restenosis after PCI of calcified lesions. Angiography has poor sensitivity for recognition and quantification of coronary calcium, thereby mandating the use of intravascular imaging. Intravascular imaging, like intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography, has the potential to accurately identify and quantify the coronary calcium and to guide appropriate modification device before stent placement. Available options for the modification of calcified plaque include modified balloons (cutting balloon, scoring balloon and high-pressure balloon), atherectomy devices (rotational atherectomy and orbital atherectomy) and laser atherectomy. Coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is the newest addition to the tool box for calcified plaque modification. It produces the acoustic shockwaves, which interact with the coronary calcium to cause multiplanar fractures. These calcium fractures increase the vessel compliance and result in desirable minimum stent areas. Coronary IVL has established its safety and efficacy for calcified lesion in series of Disrupt CAD trials. Its advantages over atherectomy devices include ease of use on workhorse wire, ability to modify deep calcium, no debris embolization causing slow flow or no-flow and minimal thermal injury. It is showing promising results in modification of difficult calcified lesion subsets such as calcified nodule, calcified left main bifurcation lesions and chronic total occlusion. In this review, authors will summarize the mechanism of action for IVL, its role in contemporary practice, evidence available for its use, its advantages over atherectomy devices and its imaging insight in different calcified lesion scenarios.

Keywords: calcified coronary artery disease; calcified left main; calcified nodule; coronary IVL; intravascular lithotripsy; shockwave for coronary calcium.

Plain language summary

Shock the rock with coronary intravascular lithotripsyPresence of coronary calcium during stenting is associated with the risk of stent under expansion. It’s imperative to adequately modify this coronary calcium before placing the stent. Till recent past, the most effective method for calcium modification is debulking it with rotational artherectomy, which is associated with the risk of coronary perforation, slow flow or abrupt vessel closure. Recently, a balloon-based lithotripsy device has established its safety and efficacy for treating such lesions. Coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is an easy to use calcium modification device and is associated with almost negligible complications, when compared with artherectomy devices. In this review, we will discuss the mechanism of IVL action and its use in different scenarios of calcified coronary artery disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Proposed algorithm for approach to severely calcified coronary artery lesion.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Imaging insight of IVL effect on circumferential coronary calcium. (a–e) Pre-IVL OCT and IVUS images showing 360° arc of calcium (asterixis) with their respective lumen areas. (f–j) Post-IVL increase in lumen areas and fractures in calcium arc (marked by arrows). (k–o) Post-PCI final MSAs and widening of calcium fractures (asterixis). IVL, intravascular lithotripsy; IVUS, intravascular ultrasound; MSA, minimal stent area; OCT, optical coherence tomography.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
IVL for coronary CN. (a–c) OCT pullback from LAD artery showing CN (asterixis) with their lumen areas. (c–e) Post-IVL OCT images at same anatomical level as that of pre-IVL showing increase in lumen areas and calcium fracture at apex (d) and at base (e, f) of the CN. (g–i) Post-PCI OCT cross sections with their respective MSAs. CN, calcified nodule; IVL, intravascular lithotripsy; MSA, minimum stent area; OCT, optical coherence tomography; LAD, left anterior descending; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Use of intravascular lithotripsy in calcified LMBD. (a) Coronary angiography showing critical distal LMBD. (b, c) OCT pullback from LM to LAD revealed deep eccentric calcium in L and B modes. Both LAD and LCx were wired and IVL balloon sized 3.5 × 12 mm2 was used to modify the deep calcium. (d) Post-IVL coronary angiography showed decrease in distal LM stenosis without slow flow, perforation, flow limiting dissection and LCx compromise. (e, f) Post-IVL OCT showed increase in distal LM luminal area (arrow) on L and B modes. A deep linear fracture was also seen in distal LM. (g) Post-PCI angiography showed significant reduction in distal LM residual stenosis without LCx compromise. (h, i) Post-PCI OCT showed increase in distal LM lumen area from 1.61 to 10.48 mm2. IVL, intravascular lithotripsy; LMBD, left main bifurcation disease; LAD, left anterior descending; LCx, left circumflex; OCT, optical coherence tomography; B mode, brightness mode; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

References

    1. Bamford P, Collins N, Boyle A. A state-of-the-art review: the percutaneous treatment of highly calcified lesions. Heart Lung Circ 2022; 31: 1573–1584. - PubMed
    1. De Maria GL, Scarsini R, Banning AP. Management of calcific coronary artery lesions: is it time to change our interventional therapeutic approach? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 12: 1465–1478. - PubMed
    1. Shah M, Najam O, Bhindi R, et al.. Calcium modification techniques in complex percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 14: e009870. - PubMed
    1. Alfonso F, Macaya C, Goicolea J, et al.. Determinants of coronary compliance in patients with coronary artery disease: an intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 879–884. - PubMed
    1. Ueki Y, Otsuka T, Hibi K, et al.. The value of intracoronary imaging and coronary physiology when treating calcified lesions. Interv Cardiol Rev 2019;14: 164–168. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources