Longevity as a Responsibility: Constructing Healthy Aging by Enacting within Contexts over the Entire Lifespan
- PMID: 39051257
- PMCID: PMC11270264
- DOI: 10.3390/geriatrics9040093
Longevity as a Responsibility: Constructing Healthy Aging by Enacting within Contexts over the Entire Lifespan
Abstract
Studying aging now requires going beyond the bio-psycho-social model and incorporating a broader multidisciplinary view capable of capturing the ultimate complexity of being human that is expressed as individuals age. Current demographic trends and the lengthening of life expectancies allow the observation of long-lived individuals in full health. These super-agers are no longer an exception. Indeed, individuals can have a good quality of life even over age 70 and living with chronic or neurodegenerative diseases. This change is driven in part by the cohort effect observed in people who are about to age today (e.g., better schooling, more advanced health conditions, and technologization) but more so by the gradual overcoming of ageist views. An aged person is no longer seen as a quitter but rather as one empowered to direct their own trajectory of potentially healthy longevity. According to this vision, this article proposes a situated lifespan perspective for the study of aging that integrates pedagogical models of developmental ecology with psychological theories of optimal experience to understand the individual motivational perspective on aging. At the same time, it does not disregard analyzing the daily and cultural contexts in which everyone situates and that guide aging trajectories. Nor does it forget that aging people are body-mind (embodied) organisms that, with contexts and through motivations, seize opportunities for action (affordances) to evolve in an optimal way during their lifespan. This theoretical reflection sheds new light on the aging process and on future trends in healthy longevity research.
Keywords: affordance; ecological lifespan development; emotional selectivity; empowerment; enactive cognition; flow experience; healthy aging; longevity; motivation; quality of life.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Morganti F. Psychology of Aging and Quality of Life. Carocci Publisher; Roma, Italy: 2022.
-
- Stanford Center on Longevity The New Map of Life. 2022. [(accessed on 15 April 2024)]. Available online: https://longevity.stanford.edu/the-new-map-of-life-full-report/
-
- Fogg C., Fraser S.D.S., Roderick P., de Lusignan S., Clegg A., Brailsford S., Barkham A., Patel H.P., Windle V., Harris S., et al. The dynamics of frailty development and progression in older adults in primary care in England (2006–2017): A retrospective cohort profile. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22:30. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02684-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
