Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul;7(7):e2117.
doi: 10.1002/cnr2.2117.

Outcomes of children treated for relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A single tertiary care center experience

Affiliations

Outcomes of children treated for relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A single tertiary care center experience

Mosfer AlMalki et al. Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is one of the most common malignancies among children. Despite success in frontline treatment, 20% of children will relapse or show resistance to treatment.

Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical characteristics of children diagnosed and treated for refractory or relapsed ALL and determine 3-year overall survival (OS) outcomes.

Method: This study involved a retrospective chart review of patients aged 1-14 years diagnosed with ALL during January 2002 to December 2018. Data were extracted for baseline characteristics at diagnosis and at relapse.

Results: A total of 347 newly diagnosed children with ALL were identified, among whom there were three induction failures (IF) and 28 relapses, resulting in a cohort of 31 patients with a relapse rate of 9%. The male-to-female ratio was 4.16:1, and the mean duration of first complete remission (CR1) was 26 months. Fifteen (48%) patients relapsed ≤18 months, 7 (23%) during 18-36 months, and 9 (29%) relapsed >36 months of IF or CR1. Nineteen patients (61%) had isolated bone marrow (BM) relapse, 7 (23%) patients experienced isolated extramedullary relapse (5 isolated CNS relapse and 2 isolated testicular relapse), and 5 (16%) patients experienced BM involvement with other sites (4 BM + CNS and 1 BM + testis). The 3-year OS of the cohort was 62.3%, while in patients with CR post first-salvage therapy, a 3-year OS of 79.5% was observed (p value <.05 compared with patients who did not achieve remission post first-salvage therapy, 3-year OS: 46.4%). The same statistical difference was observed in 3-year OS when comparing the duration of remission of CR prior to relapse: ≤18 months, 33.2%; 18-36 months, 66.7%; and >36 months, 87.5%. The same trend continued when comparing 3-year OS based on risk stratification at relapse: low risk (LR), 83.3%; intermediate risk (IR), 80%; and high risk (HR), 44.8%.

Conclusion: The incidence and outcomes reported are comparable to internationally reported data regarding the duration of CR1. Risk stratification at relapse and remission status post-salvage therapy were identified as significant prognostic factors for survival. No survival difference was observed among patients who received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after induction compared with those who received chemotherapy, which could be attributed to the smaller sample size, warranting a multi-institutional observational study. These findings corroborate the need for novel therapies and treatment approaches.

Keywords: acute lymphoblastic leukemia; children; relapse; resistance; risk stratification; survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have stated explicitly that there are no conflicts of interest in connection with this article.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Overall survival of study cohort (N = 31), retrospective study: (A) Overall survival (OS) of the cohort; (B) Overall survival of cohort comparing patients who achieved CR2 with Salvage therapy versus those who did not achieve CR; (C) Overall survival of study cohort based on duration of CR1; (D) Overall survival of study cohort based on risk‐stratification at relapse; and (E) Overall survival of study cohort based on relapse site.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Overall survival of HR patients at relapse (N = 13) comparing patients who received HSCT versus those who received chemotherapy.

References

    1. Kakaje A, Alhalabi MM, Ghareeb A, et al. Rates and trends of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: an epidemiology study. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):6756. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-63528-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Malempati S, Gaynon PS, Sather H, La MK, Stork LC, Children's Oncology Group . Outcome after relapse among children with standard‐risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Children's Oncology Group study CCG‐1952. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(36):5800‐5807. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.10.7508 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Belgaumi AF, Al‐Seraihy A, Siddiqui KS, et al. Outcome of risk adapted therapy for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children. Leuk Lymphoma. 2013;54(3):547‐554. doi:10.3109/10428194.2012.719616 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tuong PN, Kiem Hao T, Kim Hoa NT. Relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a single‐institution experience. Cureus. 2020;12(7):e9238. doi:10.7759/cureus.9238 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmed AM, Al‐Trabolsi H, Bayoumy M, Abosoudah I, Yassin F. Improved outcomes of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a retrospective single center study in Saudi Arabia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019;20(11):3391‐3398. doi:10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.11.3391 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources