Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Aug 14;62(8):e0072823.
doi: 10.1128/jcm.00728-23. Epub 2024 Jul 25.

Practical updates in clinical antiviral resistance testing

Affiliations
Review

Practical updates in clinical antiviral resistance testing

Hannah Wang. J Clin Microbiol. .

Abstract

The laboratory diagnosis of antiviral resistance is a quickly changing field due to new drug availability, the sunsetting of older drugs, the development of novel technologies, rapid viral evolution, and the financial/logistic pressures of the clinical laboratory. This mini-review summarizes the current state of clinically available antiviral resistance testing in the United States in 2024, covering the most commonly used test methods, mechanisms, and clinical indications for herpes simplex virus, cytomegalovirus, human immunodeficiency virus, influenza, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus drug resistance testing. Common themes include the move away from phenotypic to genotypic methods for first-line clinical testing, as well as uncertainty surrounding the clinical meaningfulness of minority variant detection as next-generation sequencing methods have become more commonplace.

Keywords: antiviral agents; cytomegalovirus; drug resistance mechanisms; herpes simplex virus; human immunodeficiency virus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Most common phenotypic and genotypic antiviral resistance testing methods used clinically. Created with BioRender.com.

References

    1. De Clercq E, Li G. 2016. Approved antiviral drugs over the past 50 years. Clin Microbiol Rev 29:695–747. doi:10.1128/CMR.00102-15 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van der MT, Claas ECJ. 2016. Phenotypic and genotypic antiviral susceptibility testing, p 201–228. In Loeffelholz M, Hodinka RL, Young SA, Pinsky BA (ed), Clinical virology manual, 5th ed. ASM Press, Washington DC.
    1. Huang DD, Pinsky BA, Bankowski MJ. 2019. Susceptibility test methods: viruses, p 1985–2004. In Carroll KC, Pfaller MA, Landry ML, McAdam AJ, Patel R, Richter SS, Warnock DW (ed), Manual of clinical microbiology, 12th ed, Vol 2. ASM Press, Washington DC.
    1. Strasfeld L, Chou S. 2010. Antiviral drug resistance: mechanisms and clinical implications. Infect Dis Clin North Am 24:413–437. doi:10.1016/j.idc.2010.01.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tardif KD, Jorgensen S, Langer J, Prichard M, Schlaberg R. 2014. Simultaneous titration and phenotypic antiviral drug susceptibility testing for herpes simplex virus 1 and 2. J Clin Virol 61:382–386. doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2014.08.015 - DOI - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources