Risk of Cancer in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 39053445
- PMCID: PMC12136609
- DOI: 10.1159/000540443
Risk of Cancer in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Introduction: There has been remarkable progress in both diagnosis and treatment of patients with congenital heart disease (CHD), with an increasing number of survivors. Whether patients with CHD are more likely to develop cancer is still a controversial issue. This study aimed to quantitatively estimate the association between patients with CHD and the risk of developing cancer through meta-analysis.
Methods: Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched from inception to September 2023 to identify potentially relevant case-control studies and cohort studies that reported risk estimates and confidence intervals (CIs). RevMan software was used to analyze the pooled effect size and test for heterogeneity. The random effect and fixed effect models were applied to the study period. Egger's test was performed to examine publication bias.
Results: We analyzed six studies, consisting of 2 case-control studies and 4 cohort studies comprising 276,124 participants. The overall pooled hazard risk for cancer in patients with CHD was 1.71 (95% CI: 1.28-2.28; p < 0.01), with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 97%, p < 0.01). The quantitative analysis of studies indicates that patients with CHD have an increased risk of developing cancer, even after adjusting for chromosomal disorders.
Conclusion: Our study highlights the importance of controlling modifiable factors in cancer prevention and emphasizes the need for health education for patients with CHD in primary care. Given the limited number of studies included in this analysis, further research is needed to accurately quantify the cancer risk of exposed versus unexposed CHD.
Keywords: Cancer; Congenital heart disease; Hazard risk; Meta-analysis; Systematic review.
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.
Conflict of interest statement
Regarding this paper, the authors have no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Prevalence and odds of anxiety and depression in cutaneous malignant melanoma: a proportional meta-analysis and regression.Br J Dermatol. 2024 Jun 20;191(1):24-35. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae011. Br J Dermatol. 2024. PMID: 38197404
-
Association between gestational exposure and risk of congenital heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Environ Res. 2021 Jun;197:111014. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111014. Epub 2021 Mar 11. Environ Res. 2021. PMID: 33716027
-
Use of β-adrenoreceptor drugs and Parkinson's disease incidence in women from the French E3N cohort study.J Parkinsons Dis. 2025 Jun;15(4):789-804. doi: 10.1177/1877718X251330993. Epub 2025 Apr 29. J Parkinsons Dis. 2025. PMID: 40302366
-
Molecular feature-based classification of retroperitoneal liposarcoma: a prospective cohort study.Elife. 2025 May 23;14:RP100887. doi: 10.7554/eLife.100887. Elife. 2025. PMID: 40407808 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of Telemedicine on Wound-Related and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Wounds: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Jun 10;13:e58553. doi: 10.2196/58553. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025. PMID: 40493508 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Liu A, Diller GP, Moons P, Daniels CJ, Jenkins KJ, Marelli A. Changing epidemiology of congenital heart disease: effect on outcomes and quality of care in adults. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023;20(2):126–37. - PubMed
-
- Gurvitz M, Ionescu-Ittu R, Guo L, Eisenberg MJ, Abrahamowicz M, Pilote L, et al. . Prevalence of cancer in adults with congenital heart disease compared with the general population. Am J Cardiol. 2016;118(11):1742–50. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical