Revolutionizing Organ Transplantation With Robotic Surgery
- PMID: 39056178
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006460
Revolutionizing Organ Transplantation With Robotic Surgery
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of robotic techniques on organ transplantation outcomes.
Background: The evolution of organ transplantation is becoming influenced by the adoption of minimally invasive techniques, transitioning from laparoscopic to robotic methods. Robotic surgery has emerged as a significant advancement, providing superior precision and outcomes compared with traditional approaches.
Methods: This perspective includes a systematic review of the literature, original data from a high-volume center, as well as an international survey focusing on perceptions related to robotic versus laparoscopic and open approaches.
Results: The systematic review and meta-analysis revealed lower morbidity with robotic donor nephrectomy, recipient kidney transplant and donor hepatectomy. Our center's experience, with over 3000 minimally invasive transplant procedures (kidney, liver, donor, and recipient), supports the superiority of robotic transplant surgery (RTS). The global survey confirms this shift, revealing a preference for robotic approaches due to their reduced morbidity, despite challenges such as access to the robotic system and cost.
Conclusions: This comprehensive overview including a systematic review, original data, and perceptions derived from the international survey demonstrate the superiority of robotic transplant surgery (RTS) across a range of organ transplantations, for both donors and recipients. The future of RTS depends on the efforts of the surgical community in addressing challenges such as economic implications, the need for specialized surgical training for numerous surgeons, as well as wide access to robotic systems worldwide.
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Robotic living donor hepatectomy is associated with superior outcomes for both the donor and the recipient compared with laparoscopic or open - A single-center prospective registry study of 3448 cases.Am J Transplant. 2024 Nov;24(11):2080-2091. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.04.020. Epub 2024 May 7. Am J Transplant. 2024. PMID: 38723867
-
Is there a role of robotic surgery in abdominal organs transplantations?J Robot Surg. 2020 Aug;14(4):677-678. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01002-4. Epub 2019 Sep 17. J Robot Surg. 2020. PMID: 31531754 No abstract available.
-
Minimally invasive donor hepatectomy, are we ready for prime time?World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul 7;24(25):2698-2709. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i25.2698. World J Gastroenterol. 2018. PMID: 29991875 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The use of robotic surgery in abdominal organ transplantation: A literature review.Clin Transplant. 2017 Jan;31(1). doi: 10.1111/ctr.12856. Epub 2016 Nov 15. Clin Transplant. 2017. PMID: 27726195 Review.
-
Robotic and laparoscopic right lobe living donation compared to the open approach: A multicenter study on 1194 donor hepatectomies.Liver Transpl. 2024 May 1;30(5):484-492. doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000304. Epub 2023 Nov 29. Liver Transpl. 2024. PMID: 38015444
Cited by
-
From Carrel to Robotics: Renal Transplantation and the Evolution of its Surgical Technique.Curr Urol Rep. 2025 Apr 21;26(1):38. doi: 10.1007/s11934-025-01265-5. Curr Urol Rep. 2025. PMID: 40257516 Review.
-
Artificial intelligence in kidney transplantation: a 30-year bibliometric analysis of research trends, innovations, and future directions.Ren Fail. 2025 Dec;47(1):2458754. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2025.2458754. Epub 2025 Feb 5. Ren Fail. 2025. PMID: 39910843 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Foreword.Updates Surg. 2025 Aug 14. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02361-4. Online ahead of print. Updates Surg. 2025. PMID: 40813837 No abstract available.
-
Minimally Invasive Donor Hepatectomy.J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2025 Jul-Aug;15(4):102516. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2025.102516. Epub 2025 Feb 19. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2025. PMID: 40151473 Review.
References
-
- Cherqui D, Ciria R, Kwon CHD, et al. Expert Consensus Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Donor Hepatectomy for Living Donor Liver Transplantation From Innovation to Implementation: A Joint Initiative From the International Laparoscopic Liver Society (ILLS) and the Asian-Pacific Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (A-PHPBA). Ann Surg. 2021;273:96–108.
-
- Spiers HVM, Sharma V, Woywodt A, et al. Robot-assisted kidney transplantation: an update. Clin Kidney J. 2022;15:635–643.
-
- Lincango Naranjo EP, Garces-Delgado E, Siepmann T, et al. Robotic Living Donor Right Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2022;11:2603.
-
- Raptis DA, Elsheikh Y, Alnemary Y, et al. Robotic living donor hepatectomy is associated with superior outcomes for both the donor and the recipient compared to laparoscopic or open - A single center prospective registry study of 3,448 cases [Published online May 7, 2024]. Am J Transplant. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.04.020 - DOI
-
- Broering DC, Raptis DA, Elsheikh Y. Pioneering fully robotic donor hepatectomy and robotic recipient liver graft implantation – a new horizon in liver transplantation. Int J Surg Lond Engl. 2024;110:1333.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical