Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Nov;28(4):372-397.
doi: 10.1177/10888683241263634. Epub 2024 Jul 26.

Being as Having, Loving, and Doing: A Theory of Human Well-Being

Affiliations
Review

Being as Having, Loving, and Doing: A Theory of Human Well-Being

Frank Martela. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Academic abstract: Stronger theory on the nature of human well-being is needed, especially as well-being indicators are increasingly utilized in policy contexts. Building on Erik Allardt, who argued that a theory of well-being is, in essence, a theory of human nature, I propose four modes of existence each capturing one dimension central to human well-being: Having recognizes humans as biological creatures requiring certain material resources for survival. Loving captures human social nature and our dependence on others for well-being. Doing highlights the active and agentic nature of human existence. Being acknowledges humans as experiencing their existence. Each mode of existence gives rise to a few more specific needs, and a full assessment of human well-being requires both subjective and objective indicators tapping into these needs. The proposed theory integrates psychological well-being research with sociological and philosophical traditions and contributes to debates about how the progress of nations and sustainability should be measured.

Public abstract: Well-being is something we all value individually, and it is also a key political goal. Accordingly, how we define and measure well-being influences what physicians, managers, policy-makers, politicians, and international organizations aim to improve through their work. Better theories of well-being make better measurement of well-being possible, which makes possible more effective and evidence-based advancement of human well-being. In this spirit, the present article argues that there are four fundamental dimensions to human well-being: Having highlights that as biological creatures, we have physical needs, loving highlights human social needs, doing highlights that we are active and agentic beings with goals and strivings, and being highlights that we feel and evaluate our lives. To assess well-being, we need measures tapping into all four of these dimensions. And to assess the sustainability of well-being, we need to examine how to provide well-being for all humanity while remaining within planetary boundaries.

Keywords: Erik Allardt; eudaimonic well-being; physical needs; psychological needs; self-determination theory; subjective well-being; well-being.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A Schematic Overview of the Relations Between Need Satisfiers, Human Needs, and Perceived Well-Being.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
A Rough Characterization of the Relations Between Well-Being and Types of Sustainability.

References

    1. Adjei S. B. (2019). Conceptualising personhood, agency, and morality for African psychology. Theory & Psychology, 29(4), 484–505. 10.1177/0959354319857473 - DOI
    1. Aknin L. B., Barrington-Leigh C. P., Dunn E. W., Helliwell J. F., Burns J., Biswas-Diener R., Kemeza I., Nyende P., Ashton-James C. E., Norton M. I. (2013). Prosocial spending and well-being: Cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 635–652. - PubMed
    1. Aknin L. B., Broesch T., Hamlin J. K., Van de Vondervoort J. W. (2015). Prosocial behavior leads to happiness in a small-scale rural society. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(4), 788–795. - PubMed
    1. Alderfer C. P. (1969). An empirical test of a new theory of human needs. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 4(2), 142–175.
    1. Alexandrova A. (2017). A philosophy for the science of well-being. Oxford University Press.

LinkOut - more resources