Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jun 25;9(7):386.
doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9070386.

The Impact of Nano-Hydroxyapatite Scaffold Enrichment on Bone Regeneration In Vivo-A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

The Impact of Nano-Hydroxyapatite Scaffold Enrichment on Bone Regeneration In Vivo-A Systematic Review

Dijana Mitić et al. Biomimetics (Basel). .

Abstract

Objectives: In order to ensure improved and accelerated bone regeneration, nano-hydroxyapatite scaffolds are often enriched with different bioactive components to further accelerate and improve bone healing. In this review, we critically examined whether the enrichment of nHAp/polymer scaffolds with growth factors, hormones, polypeptides, microRNAs and exosomes improved new bone formation in vivo.

Materials and methods: Out of 2989 articles obtained from the literature search, 106 papers were read in full, and only 12 articles met the inclusion criteria for this review.

Results: Several bioactive components were reported to stimulate accelerated bone regeneration in a variety of bone defect models, showing better results than bone grafting with nHAp scaffolds alone.

Conclusions: The results indicated that composite materials based on nHAp are excellent candidates as bone substitutes, while nHAp scaffold enrichment further accelerates bone regeneration. The standardization of animal models should be provided in order to clearly define the most significant parameters of in vivo studies. Only in this way can the adequate comparison of findings from different in vivo studies be possible, further advancing our knowledge on bone regeneration and enabling its translation to clinical settings.

Keywords: bioactive components; bone scaffold; nano-hydroxyapatite; regeneration; tissue engineering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram. From: Page M.J., McKenzie J.E., Bossuyt P.M., Boutron I., Hoffmann T.C., Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71 [22].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nauth A., Schemitsch E., Norris B., Nollin Z., Watson J.T. Critical-Size Bone Defects: Is There a Consensus for Diagnosis and Treatment? J. Orthop. Trauma. 2018;32:S7–S11. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001115. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang S., Yang Y., Zhao Z., Wang X., Mikos A.G., Qiu Z., Song T., Sun X., Zhao L., Zhang C., et al. Mineralized Collagen-Based Composite Bone Materials for Cranial Bone Regeneration in Developing Sheep. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2017;3:1092–1099. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00159. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baldwin P., Li D.J., Auston D.A., Mir H.S., Yoon R.S., Koval K.J. Autograft, Allograft, and Bone Graft Substitutes: Clinical Evidence and Indications for Use in the Setting of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery. J. Orthop. Trauma. 2019;33:203–213. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001420. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paraš S., Trišić D., Mitrović Ajtić O., Prokić B., Drobne D., Živković S., Jokanović V. Toxicological Profile of Nanostructured Bone Substitute Based on Hydroxyapatite and Poly(Lactide-Co-Glycolide) after Subchronic Oral Exposure of Rats. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:918. doi: 10.3390/nano10050918. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tsiklin I.L., Shabunin A.V., Kolsanov A.V., Volova L.T. In Vivo Bone Tissue Engineering Strategies: Advances and Prospects. Polymers. 2022;14:3222. doi: 10.3390/polym14153222. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources