Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2024 Jul 18;12(7):223.
doi: 10.3390/dj12070223.

Failed Orthodontic PEEK Retainer: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis and a Possible Failure Mechanism in a Case Report

Affiliations
Case Reports

Failed Orthodontic PEEK Retainer: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis and a Possible Failure Mechanism in a Case Report

Piero Antonio Zecca et al. Dent J (Basel). .

Abstract

This study presents a scanning electron microscopy analysis of a failed PEEK retainer in an orthodontic patient. After 15 months of use, the patient reported a gap opening between teeth 41 and 42. The PEEK retainer was removed and sent for electron microscope analysis. To investigate the failure, scanning electron microscopy was employed to assess the microstructure and composition of the retainer at various magnifications. These findings suggest that the failure of the PEEK retainer was multifaceted, implicating factors such as material defects, manufacturing flaws, inadequate design, environmental factors, and patient-related factors. In conclusion, this scanning electron microscopy analysis offers valuable insights into the failure mechanisms of PEEK retainers in orthodontic applications. Further research is necessary to explore preventive strategies and optimize the design and fabrication of PEEK retainers, minimizing the occurrence of failures in orthodontic practice.

Keywords: orthodontic relapse; orthodontic retainer; polyetheretherketone; scanning electron microscopy SEM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Final photo with retainer applied.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Photo after 15 months; note the opening of the space between teeth 41 and 42 due to orthodontic relapse.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Scanning electron microscopy images; note the smooth and compact surface of the material.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Scanning electron microscopy image; note how the material begins to delaminate and there is widespread bacterial contamination.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Delamination detail.

References

    1. Al-Moghrabi D., Pandis N., Fleming P.S. The effects of fixed and removable orthodontic retainers: A systematic review. Prog. Orthod. 2016;17:24. doi: 10.1186/s40510-016-0137-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kusaibati A.M., Sultan K., Hajeer M.Y., Burhan A.S., Alam M.K. Adult patient expectations and satisfaction: Can they be influenced by viewing the three-dimensional predicted outcome before fixed orthodontic treatment of dental crowding? J. World Fed. Orthod. 2023;12:269–279. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2023.08.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Seide M., Kruse T., Graf I., Bourauel C., Lapatki B.G., Jäger R., Braumann B. Inadvertent side effects of fixed lingual retainers: An in vitro study. J. Orofac. Orthop. Fortschritte Kieferorthopädie. 2024;85:223–232. doi: 10.1007/s00056-022-00432-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Naraghi S., Ganzer N., Bondemark L., Sonesson M. Comparison of post-treatment changes with and without retention in adolescents treated for maxillary impacted canines—A randomized controlled trial. Eur. J. Orthod. 2021;43:121–127. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjaa010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Win P.P., Chen D.D.S., Sainbayar B., Peng T.Y., Cheng J.H.C. Assessment of mechanical characteristics of polyetheretherketone as orthodontic fixed lingual retainers. J. Dent. Sci. 2023;18:1804–1811. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.05.026. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources