Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 22;10(7):509.
doi: 10.3390/jof10070509.

Molecular Evaluation of the mRNA Expression of the ERG11, ERG3, CgCDR1, and CgSNQ2 Genes Linked to Fluconazole Resistance in Candida glabrata in a Colombian Population

Affiliations

Molecular Evaluation of the mRNA Expression of the ERG11, ERG3, CgCDR1, and CgSNQ2 Genes Linked to Fluconazole Resistance in Candida glabrata in a Colombian Population

Leidy Yurany Cárdenas Parra et al. J Fungi (Basel). .

Abstract

Introduction: The study of Candida glabrata genes associated with fluconazole resistance, from a molecular perspective, increases the understanding of the phenomenon with a view to its clinical applicability.

Objective: We sought to establish the predictive molecular profile of fluconazole resistance in Candida glabrata by analyzing the ERG11, ERG3, CgCDR1, and CgSNQ2 genes.

Method: Expression was quantified using RT-qPCR. Metrics were obtained through molecular docking and Fisher discriminant functions. Additionally, a predictive classification was made against the susceptibility of C. glabrata to fluconazole.

Results: The relative expression of the ERG3, CgCDR1, and CgSNQ2 genes was higher in the fluconazole-resistant strains than in the fluconazole-susceptible, dose-dependent strains. The gene with the highest relative expression in the fluconazole-exposed strains was CgCDR1, and in both the resistant and susceptible, dose-dependent strains exposed to fluconazole, this was also the case. The molecular docking model generated a median number of contacts between fluconazole and ERG11 that was lower than the median number of contacts between fluconazole and ERG3, -CgCDR1, and -CgSNQ2. The predicted classification through the multivariate model for fluconazole susceptibility achieved an accuracy of 73.5%.

Conclusion: The resistant strains had significant expression levels of genes encoding efflux pumps and the ERG3 gene. Molecular analysis makes the identification of a low affinity between fluconazole and its pharmacological target possible, which may explain the lower intrinsic susceptibility of the fungus to fluconazole.

Keywords: Candida glabrata; fluconazole; fungal drug resistance; molecular docking simulation; multivariate analysis; reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Relative expression levels of the CgCDR1 gene for strains not exposed vs. strains exposed to fluconazole. (B) Relative expression levels of the ERG11 gene for strains not exposed vs. strains exposed to fluconazole. (C) Relative expression levels of the ERG3 gene for strains not exposed vs. strains exposed to fluconazole. (D) Relative expression levels of the CgSNQ2 gene for strains not exposed vs. strains exposed to fluconazole.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relative expression of the CgCDR1 gene according to susceptibility profile and the exposure to fluconazole.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relative expression of the ERG11 gene according to susceptibility profile and the exposure to fluconazole.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Relative expression of the ERG3 gene according to susceptibility profile and the exposure to fluconazole.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Relative expression of the CgSNQ2 gene according to susceptibility profile and the exposure to fluconazole.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Comparative representations of fluconazole and the proteins of interest docking. (A) Three-dimensional presentation of the molecular relationship (docking) between fluconazole and ERG11. (B) Three-dimensional presentation of the molecular relationship between fluconazole and CgCDR1. Hydrophobic interactions with the residues are shown with dashed gray lines and with gray surfaces on the proteins.

References

    1. Whaley S.G., Berkow E.L., Rybak J.M., Nishimoto A.T., Barker K.S., Rogers P.D. Azole Antifungal Resistance in Candida albicans and Emerging Non-albicans Candida Species. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:2173. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02173. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arendrup M.C., Patterson T.F. Multidrug-Resistant Candida: Epidemiology, Molecular Mechanisms, and Treatment. J. Infect. Dis. 2017;216((Suppl. S3)):S445–S451. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix131. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zuluaga Rodríguez A., de Bedout Gómez C., Agudelo Restrepo C.A., Hurtado Parra H., Arango Arteaga M., Restrepo Moreno Á., González Marín Á. Sensibilidad a fluconazol y voriconazol de especies de Candida aisladas de pacientes provenientes de unidades de cuidados intensivos en Medellín, Colombia (2001–2007) Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2010;27:125–129. doi: 10.1016/j.riam.2010.04.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cortés J.A., Reyes P., Gómez C.H., Cuervo S.I., Rivas P., Casas C.A., Sánchez R. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics and risk factors for mortality in patients with candidemia in hospitals from Bogotá, Colombia. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2014;18:631–637. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2014.06.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maldonado N.A., Cano L.E., De Bedout C., Arbeláez C.A., Roncancio G., Tabares M., Robledo C.G., Robledo J. Association of clinical and demographic factors in invasive candidiasis caused by fluconazole-resistant Candida species: A study in 15 hospitals, Medellín, Colombia 2010–2011. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2014;79:280–286. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.02.003. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources