Does preperitoneal packing increase venous thromboembolim risk among trauma patients? A prospective multicenter analysis across 17 level I trauma centers
- PMID: 39058389
- DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004416
Does preperitoneal packing increase venous thromboembolim risk among trauma patients? A prospective multicenter analysis across 17 level I trauma centers
Abstract
Introduction: Pelvic fractures are associated with a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Among treatment options, including pelvic angioembolization (PA), preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP), and pelvic open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), PPP has been postulated as a VTE risk factor. We aimed to characterize the risk of VTE among pelvic fracture patients receiving PPP, PA or ORIF.
Methods: We used observational data from a 17-site Consortium of Leaders in the Study of Traumatic Thromboembolism (CLOTT) study group, a US level I trauma center collaborative working to identify factors associated with posttraumatic VTE, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or pulmonary thrombosis. The CLOTT criteria included age 18 to 40 years with at least one independent VTE risk factor. We compared outcomes of PPP, PA, and pelvic ORIF to reference of no pelvic intervention. Our primary outcome was VTE. A competing risk analysis was performed.
Results: Among 1,387 pelvic fracture patients, VTE incidence was 5.6%. The ORIF patients were most likely to develop VTE (24.7%), while VTE incidence for PPP was 9.0% and 2.6% for PA. After multivariate, risk-competing analysis, none of the three treatment interventions for pelvic fractures were significantly associated with VTE. Initiation of VTE prophylaxis in the first 24 hours of admission independently halved VTE incidence (hazard ratio, 0.55; confidence interval, 0.33-0.91).
Conclusion: Pelvic fracture interventions do not appear to be independent risk factors for VTE in our study. Initiation of VTE pharmacoprophylaxis within the first 24 hours of admission remains critical to significantly decreasing VTE formation in this high-risk population.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic Study; Level III.
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
References
-
- Nelson JT, Coleman JR, Carmichael H, Mauffrey C, Vintimilla DR, Samuels JM, et al. High rate of fibrinolytic shutdown and venous thromboembolism in patients with severe pelvic fracture. J Surg Res . 2020;246:182–189.
-
- Park JS, Jang JH, Park KY, Moon NH. High energy injury is a risk factor for preoperative venous thromboembolism in the patients with hip fractures: a prospective observational study. Injury . 2018;49(6):1155–1161.
-
- El-Daly I, Reidy J, Culpan P, Bates P. Thromboprophylaxis in patients with pelvic and acetabular fractures: a short review and recommendations. Injury . 2013;44(12):1710–1720.
-
- Knudson MM, Ikossi DG, Khaw L, Morabito D, Speetzen LS. Thromboembolism after trauma: an analysis of 1602 episodes from the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Data Bank. Ann Surg . 2004;240(3):490–496 discussion 496-498.
-
- Van Gent JM, Calvo RY, Zander AL, Olson EJ, Sise CB, Sise MJ, et al. Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism after traumatic injury: a competing risks analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2017;83(6):1154–1160.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
