Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1985 Dec;22(6):980-3.
doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.6.980-983.1985.

Evaluation of the RapID-ANA system for identification of anaerobic bacteria of veterinary origin

Evaluation of the RapID-ANA system for identification of anaerobic bacteria of veterinary origin

W S Adney et al. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Dec.

Abstract

This study evaluated the ability of the RapID-ANA system (Innovative Diagnostic Systems, Inc., Atlanta, Ga.) to accurately identify a spectrum of freshly isolated veterinary anaerobes. A total of 183 isolates were tested and included 7 Actinomyces spp., 53 Bacteroides spp., 32 Clostridium spp., 2 Eubacterium spp., 65 Fusobacterium spp., 1 Peptococcus spp., 22 Peptostreptococcus spp., and 1 Propionibacterium spp. All isolates were initially identified by conventional biochemical testing and gas-liquid chromatography of short-chain fatty acid metabolites. Additional tests were performed as required by the RapID-ANA system. Of these isolates, 81.4% were correctly identified to the genus level, including 59.6% to the species level, 14.2% were incorrectly identified at the genus level, and 4.4% were not identified. Initially, 20.2% of the strains were not identified because the microcodes were not in the code book. The majority of the incorrect identifications were caused by the misidentification of Fusobacterium spp. as Bacteroides spp. Errors also occurred when veterinary anaerobes not included in the data base were assigned an identification from the existing data base. The RapID-ANA system appears to be a promising new method for rapid identification of veterinary anaerobes; however, further evaluation with an extended data base is needed before the system can accurately identify all clinically significant anaerobes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Vet Res. 1977 Jul;38(7):1069-73 - PubMed
    1. Am J Vet Res. 1979 Jun;40(6):876-81 - PubMed
    1. Can J Comp Med. 1979 Apr;43(2):194-9 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Jun;21(6):894-8 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Jan;21(1):122-6 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources